Faced with the controversy, the artist defends himself by ensuring that “no sexual act took place” and that it was only a “mimed” scene.
On July 22, Patrick Sébastien was performing at Cap d’A agde (Hérault) as part of a concert organized in a Natural camping. According to Mediapartthe event had been presented as a “Festive, warm and colorful“, “open to everyone, in a friendly and joyful atmosphere“. For the occasion, more than 2,000 people, including Many families with childrenwere present in order to applaud the interpreter of Sardines.
But according to information from our colleagues, the evening took an unexpected turn. In the middle of the concert, A spectator would indeed have gone on stage and would have practiced a blowjob (or a fellatio simulacrum) on the singerunder the laughter of the latter.
A video Who is currently circulating on social networks shows the spectator kneeling in front of Patrick Sébastien, hilarious, the microphone in hand.
So Patrick Sébastien would have received a blowjob on stage, in front (among others) minors in a campsite?
Showing sexual content to children is not entertainment is a serious irresponsibility. pic.twitter.com/zKjqzMbGVG
— Mathilda Nemesis (@mathildaNemesis) July 29, 2025
A “mimed” gesture defends Patrick Sébastien
Questioned about this by the investigation site, the lawyer of the former presenter of Biggest cabaret in the world reacted by saying that the gesture was “mimé“And not real. He did not deny the scene, but said that it was a humorous staging. For him, there was”No sexual act “only a deliberately burlesque provocation.
He also accuses the spectator of having improvised this obscene pantomime. “”His intervention was neither planned nor desired“He specifies.”Mr. Patrick Sébastien was strongly surprised by the behavior of this woman and did not fail to end this staging “continues the lawyer, before clearing up: “He did not know the presence of minors “.
For its part, the management of the campsite has recognized a behavior “sexual “ and presented his “sincere apologies“, admitting that the scene,”totally unpredictable “, did not correspond to the family framework provided for this type of event. She claims to have contacted the production company downright prod and reserves “The possibility of following this incident which would seem required “.
