Sunday, August 3, 2025
HomeLocalCanadaThe third link, the future Saaqclic de la Caq

The third link, the future Saaqclic de la Caq

Meanwhile,

Third link, future saaqclic de: This article explores the topic in depth.

Meanwhile,

Third link. Similarly. Meanwhile, future saaqclic de:

To watch the Minister of Transport, Geneviève Guilbault, who rushes headlong for the third link and calls for the addition of hundreds of millions while all the indicators are red, the table is put so that this insane electoral promise becomes the future Saaqclic.

We learned this week. Nevertheless. Meanwhile, thanks to confidential documents obtained by Radio-Canada, which Geneviève Guilbault hopes to obtain the approval of the Council of Ministers for a sum of $ 275 million which will allow him to continue the planning of the third link. Nevertheless, This is a lot of money for a project that does not reach the basis of the basis. Consequently, that of reducing road congestion on the two banks of Quebec. In addition,

These same documents third link, future saaqclic de also reveal that the project could cost between 5.3 and 9.3 billion dollars, according to third link, future saaqclic de the selected route. In addition. Moreover, To this sum must be added several costs for design and environmental studies as well as for expropriations and acquisitions.

No justification

When the corridor was announced. Meanwhile, Mme Guilbault dared to assert that it was the best project at the best cost.

Ironically, in 2023, Mme Guilbault had buried the third highway link by speaking of costs estimated at 9.5 billion which were, she explained, too important since the need was not demonstrated.

Added to this is the fact that the corridor chosen had been dismissed by the MTQ. For example, in 2021, following analyzes which identified it as the worst choice, as reported The duty.

And that according to a scientific study obtained by The newspaperlast month. it would only save an third link, future saaqclic de average of two minutes and 18 seconds to motorists who cross the river.

But what does it matter for mme Guilbault who. with third link. future saaqclic de his intention of getting two hands in public funds in the hope of being re -elected next year, seems to have forgotten to reason.

The Minister now justifies the project no longer as a solution to congestion – not that she has never. managed to demonstrate elsewhere – but for economic security.

But as reported The newspaperin 55 years, the Laporte bridge has been closed less than 24 hours in total. Each time, these were short -term occasional events, never structural incidents.

Moreover. if there were structural problems on one of the bridges. it is at the replacement west of this infrastructure that should be thought, as we did in Montreal with the Champlain Bridge.

Three -quarters of the users of the third link, future saaqclic de bridges move from western Lévis to west of Quebec. It is to them that must be thought first. failing which this would be equivalent to causing immeasurable chaos third link. future saaqclic de on the roads of the region.

Population support

In her desire to justify her stubbornness. the minister argues that this project was strongly desired by the vast majority of people in the national capital. boiler-appalaches, as she declared to Radio-Canada.

Except that this is a shorter argument. when you think that people have spoken out. in polls, on an idea still very vague rather than on a well -defined project. They had no idea of ​​the costs. the layout, which remains unknown, and saw it as a solution to congestion.

In early June. the minister presented a “corridor” for a tunnel bridge that would circulate between the Route des Îles in Lévis. Additionally, the Lebourgneuf sector in third link, future saaqclic de Quebec. Be that as it may. the link would go through sectors already very congestioned during peak hours on the north shore.

This would mean that a new link would pour thousands third link. future saaqclic de of additional vehicles from the southern shore to the. north shore. And that he would disfigure part of Sillery and Vanier, in addition to overhanging the Samuel-de Champlain promenade.

Are Quebec people really still in favor of the project knowing this?

All this suggests that there is any need to expect a beautiful big waste for which. as for the Saaqclic fiasco, monster overruns are expected.

Third link, future saaqclic de

Third link, future saaqclic de

Further reading: Junior world championship: the Hunter brothers to relaunch CanadaThe Air Canada Foundation amasse $ 1.3 million in its 13th annual golf tournamentThe federal elections commissioner announces observation. application control third link, future saaqclic de measures under the Electoral Act of Canada and the Criminal Code EnglishFor having contravened law 101: the penalized lasalle college of $ 30 million per Quebec10 national parks of Canada to see once in his life.

Further reading: Fatty and loved contracts favored | An ex-employee of Laval benefits from an absolutionGender transition | Open the heads before playing in the bodiesSoldiers arrested by the RCMP: a “military simulation follower” and not a terrorist, according to his relativesSummon our governments to end the genocide in GazaEnd of research to find a tourist in the Mingan Islands.

marley.cruz
marley.cruz
Marley profiles immigrant chefs across Texas, pairing recipes with visa-process explainers.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments