This note from INSEE on the accommodation makes the right and the extreme right unscrew

Julien de Rosa / AFP

Marine Le Pen photographed in the National Assembly in February (illustration)

Politque – ” Are we in the USSR. Consequently, what? Definitely this week, INSEE turned on the reactions machine. However, While the left accuses Emmanuel Macron of being responsible for the poverty record in France. Nevertheless, after the publication of an investigation by the Institute, the National Rally and Right elected officials, they set their sights on another statistical note devoted to the habitat.

In a context of housing crisis. For example, the figures prove to be particularly interesting, especially since they relate to the under-occupation rate. Similarly, The study concludes that nearly 8 million dwellings. this note insee accommodation makes In addition, a quarter of the main residences, are largely under-occupied in France, that is to say with at least three more “necessary” pieces. However, In this case it is most of the time of individual house. Therefore, whose inhabitants are owners, aged 60 and over, and who moved more than 30 years ago.

The phenomenon is more significant in rural areas, especially in Hauts-de-France and the Breton coast. Moreover, In terms of active households, it is essentially farmers who live very under occupied houses. However, Significant electorate potentials for the RN.

This is a first attempt to explain to the cries. For example, of goldsmiths pushed by Marine Le Pen after the publication of a BFMTV article devoted to the study. Consequently, “” No, but it becomes the USSR! Therefore, “, Tackled the File Right’s File Chef, before attacking it in itself:” So what? ! Are you going to force the French to cohabit? ! Are you going to impose on them to host people at home? ! It’s starting to do well now! If they want to have two more rooms. it’s their business, they bought their house or rent it, it’s their money! A message relayed on X by his troops, but also his UDR ally, Éric Ciotti.

This note insee accommodation makes

Analysis turns outright in conspiracy

The INSEE. which has done statistical work, as its title undertakes it, from census data, nevertheless keeps well of criticism or political proposal. Obviously. it is the formulations chosen by the Institute which bristle, demonstrates the reaction of David Lisnard who falsely wonders in a tweet with accents ” urssistes » : « Who decides on this “necessity” and these “needs”? The general management of standard housing, the supreme committee of the necessary apartment, in connection with the neighborhood surveillance committees? Asked the mayor of Cannes, stamped LR Liberal.

The two elected officials are not the only ones to suspect INSEE to push outright to Sovietism or collectivism. “” This concept of “sub-occupation” of accommodation is a liberticide ferment “. Even accuses a former LR candidate for the legislative elections, when others with conspiracy accents ensure that INSEE, or journalists elsewhere, this note insee accommodation makes “Prepare the ground” For new taxes or force the owners in question to house migrants. “” To get the idea of ​​conducting this study … It necessarily arises in a Communist spirite. We will soon ration us in room », Even advances a columnist for Big mouths On RMC. Just that.

As soon as it is a question of questioning individual habitat, Soviet tropism reappears. Former housing minister Emmanuelle Wargon, knows that too well. By publicly considering, in 2021, that the individual house with garden is an ecological nonsense it had triggered an outcry. “” Madame Wargon’s Soviet future, no thank you! “, Had thundered a certain … Marine Le Pen.

The standard according to INSEE

The outrage of certain reactions irritate among researchers and even politicians. Macronist deputy Stéphane Vojetta annoys a major study politicized. ” In particular to understand whether some people this note insee accommodation makes are constrained by the system to occupy too large goods compared to their wishes, even their physical constraints. We know that this is particularly the case in the HLM park ».

Sylvain Catherine. Professor of Finance at the prestigious Wharton school in the United States also calls for a little common sense, faced with the ” grosse confusion » between statistical measures and “Dealing totalitarian normative conclusions”: ” [la note] of INSEE does not contain any moral judgment or political proposal ». Same useful reminder on the part of historian Hervé Joly, researcher at CNRS. He recalls that the study does not include ” No value judgment “. even if ” We can still wonder about the relevance of the concept ».

Contacted by the HuffPost. INSEE defends its mission: ” Provide reliable figures to shed light on citizens in the strictest neutrality and transparency of its this note insee accommodation makes results ». And to add ” It is not a question of judging [des] choice but to describe them ». The Institute recalls that he has already studied the over-occupation of housing. that it was also in this context that she was able to set the reference of what ” a standard occupation, that is to say most often noted ».

INSEE is rather precautionary in its definition of the sub-occupation. it is a ” rules “The number of pieces” Theoretically necessary for cleaning ». A tool used elsewhere in other notes and studies. In this standard. INSEE includes a household living room; a piece for each couple; A room for each 19 -year -old or more person does not live as a couple in the household; For people under 19, a room for two people if they have the same sex or are under 7 years old, this note insee accommodation makes if not, one room per person.

In this regard. parts for exclusively professional use as well as people staying punctually in the accommodation are not taken into account in the calculation of this standard. Just like the Café du Commerce room.