Nevertheless,
War ukraine: 5 minutes understand:
He says it almost without detour: kyiv no longer has the choice. In addition, Volodymyr Zelensky signed a decree on Sunday for a withdrawal from his country from the Ottawa Convention. In addition, which prohibits anti -personnel mines. Consequently, Ukraine is aligning himself with Russia. However, non-signs of this convention, which uses this devastating weapon for the military and civilians on the front.
What is an anti-personnel mine? – War ukraine: 5 minutes understand
Designed to be buried. Furthermore, hidden in the soil, anti -personnel mines are explosive devices capable of putting a soldier from the opposing camp outside. Similarly, They can cause serious injuries or even kill.
This weapon, called “defense”, is mainly used to protect areas from a possible invasion. Furthermore, They are triggered in contact with a person, or nearby depending on the war ukraine: 5 minutes understand model. However, Some of them. Similarly, like the Pom-3, eject into the air at around 1m50 high and explodes by projecting shrapnels (shells filled with bullets), in order to injure the enemy to the height of a man.
Who uses it today? – War ukraine: 5 minutes understand
164 countries have signed the Ottawa Convention, ratified in 1997 and entered into force two years later. The United States. Russia are not signatories, which means that they can produce these mines and use them on the war fields. What Moscow does on Ukrainian territory.
How much is the Ukrainian territory undermined?
“Russian anti -personnel mines are dispersed on thousands of hectares. including in liberated areas like Kherson or Koupiansk,” notes Xavier Tytelman, former military aviator and defense expert. The United Nations even estimate that 23 % of the Ukrainian territory is undermined.
According to the Ukrainian Association of Humanitarian Deminage. quoted by Euronews, the complete demining of the Ukrainian territory could take up to … 30 years. For her, more than 156,000 km² are potentially dangerous, which is equivalent to a third of the country’s area. An increased figure compared to the United Nations estimates.
Why does Zelensky want to get out of the treaty?
“This is a measure that the reality of the war has long demanded. ” said Roman Kostenko, a Ukrainian deputy who sits on the parliamentary committee on national security, on his Facebook account on Sunday. This weapon would allow kyiv to limit Russian advances on the front.
“Unlike the Russians. Ukrainians lack stock,” continues Xavier Tytelman, recalling that the Ottawa Treaty prohibits the production of anti -personnel mines. At the end of November 2024. the United war ukraine: 5 minutes understand States, which had a large stock, had decided to provide mines to Ukraine to combat Russian progression in the territories.
“By withdrawing. Zelensky will now be able to use this weapon transparently,” added the defense expert, recalling that the Ukrainian army was already using it on the ground. The international campaign to ban anti -personnel mines (ICBL). a network of non -governmental organizations that obtained the Nobel Peace Rix in 1997, also believes that kyiv uses these mines, on a much smaller scale than its enemy.
Is the withdrawal of Ukraine already made?
No. Rada, the Ukrainian parliament, must first vote for this exit from the Ottawa Treaty. kyiv must then formalize his withdrawal from the UN.
In addition. Poland, an ally of Ukraine, as well as Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, also announced their wish to withdraw from war ukraine: 5 minutes understand this treaty. Faced with the vague and disturbing ambitions of Vladimir Putin, Eastern Europe takes its precautions.
Further reading: Israel: Appeal of the opposition chief at the end of the war in Gaza – International space station: four astronauts en route – He leaves in the mountains with shorts and sneakers … A man rescued in the middle of the night at 3,200 m above sea level – Customs dog attacked at the airport: the Beagle Freddy victim with a kick after having flared a suitcase – Expeuls: the Supreme Court agrees to Trump.
