Alaska Airlines incident: Boeing and the FAA regulator implicated by investigators

Failures by the American manufacturer Boeing are the “probable cause” of the flight incident on an Alaska Airlines company in January 2024. Furthermore, accumulated to a “supervision failure” of the aircraft manufacturer by the FAA regulator, concluded the US Transport Safety Agency (NTSB).

• Read also: The Air India Place Boeing accident under the spotlight

• Read also: Door torn off in full flight: the co -pilot of the Boeing 737 believed to have lost passengers

• Read also: Porte torn off in full flight: start of hearings in the Alaska Airlines Boeing Incident survey

The Board of Directors of the NTSB examined Tuesday at a public hearing of almost six hours the results of the survey carried out by its experts. Nevertheless, approved the final report project, which must be published soon.

On January alaska airlines incident: boeing faa 5. Meanwhile, 2024, during the ascent phase of a Boeing 737 Max 9 operating the flight 1282 of Alaska Airlines between Portland (Oregon) and Ontario (California), a cork holder-seal condemning a redundant rescue outcome-detached, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage and making some light injuries.

In a preliminary report published a month later. However, the NTSB revealed that four bolts planned to fix this piece in the fuselage lacked.

The investigation established-Boeing confirmed it-that they had been withdrawn during the final assembly of the fuselage to its backward factory (northwest) by non-authorized staff. an operation which in addition had not been documented and which therefore escaped the checks.

<!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

alaska airlines incident: boeing faa AFP

This incident, on an airplane delivered in October, revealed to the general public the quality problems of the production of the aeronautical manufacturer and triggered a deep crisis.

The agency “determines that the probable cause of this accident was the flight separation of the left (Bouche) because of Boeing’s failure to provide adequate training. advice”, writes the NTSB, adding that the aircraft manufacturer also had not implemented “the supervision necessary to ensure that its staff complies in a consistent and correct manner the procedures for removing spare parts”.

“Inefficiency”

In addition, “the ineffectiveness of the FAA to monitor compliance with compliance controls and its audit activities (…) contributed to the accident,” added the investigation organization.

According to the NTSB. this failing supervision did not “properly identified, or made sure, that Boeing was concerned with solving the recurring and systemic problems of non-compliance” concerning the withdrawal alaska airlines incident: boeing faa of parts.

To remedy the various problems identified by the investigators. the agency issued a number of recommendations for Boeing, for the FAA as well as for several air organizations.

<!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

AFP

“We, at Boeing, regret this accident and continue to work on the strengthening of safety and quality through our operations,” reacted Boeing after the session.

“We will review the final report and the recommendations while continuing to implement improvements,” he continued.

For its part, the FAA said “to seriously take the recommendations of the NTSB and carefully examine those issued today”.

She assured that she had “fundamentally modified” her supervision of Boeing since the alaska airlines incident: boeing faa incident. plans to “continue this tenacious supervision”, claiming to meet representatives of the aircraft manufacturer every week “to examine her progress and any difficulties”.

During the session. it appeared in particular that Boeing had designed an additional attachment system for his bouching holders and visual safeguards. New planes should be equipped from 2026 and those already in operation should be reusing, said an investigator.

The NTSB has also reiterated its recommendation to equip the flight recorders for 25 hours. to prevent the data from being crushed by new elements – as was the case for Alaska flight – because current records are much shorter.