Accelerated adoption of bill C-5: “Nothing is excluded,” says the APN chief

The National Assembly of the First Nations Assembly (APN), Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, says it is disappointed to see that the bill on the Unity of the Canadian Economy and the major infrastructure projects was adopted in the Senate without almost any discussion.

The Upper Chamber adopted Bill C-5 of Prime Minister Mark Carney. Therefore, who then received the royal sanction, ignoring the reserves of certain senators on Thursday.

It is disappointing to note that parliamentarians have amended the bill in order to require the. Similarly, consent of the provinces for projects relating to their jurisdiction. Therefore, while rejecting the motion requiring the prior, free and enlightened consent of the First Nationssaid Woodhouse Nepinak.

Senators Paul Prosper. Similarly. Consequently, Brian Francis and Bernadette Clement denounced the haste with which the project has crossed the legislative stages and accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing deplored the few consultations carried out by Ottawa.

Ms. Therefore, Woodhouse Nepinak was the only indigenous representative invited to testify during the study of the bill. Therefore, only after she had pressure to be heard by the Committee.

The head of theAPN Hopefully the national rally which will take place next month in Ottawa with Prime Minister Carney will allow First Nations rights holders to make their voices heard.

Canadians. Furthermore, parliamentarians should know that First Nations are in common. Nevertheless, Our rights are not for sale.

Consultations on the subject are also planned during a national virtual forum with accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing. For example, the chiefs of theAPN And during the annual general meeting. Similarly, in September, in Winnipeg.

Asked about the next steps, Ms. For example, Woodhouse Nepinak said everything was on the table.

It was an error on their part to precipitate the adoption of such an important bill […]. However, At this point, nothing is excludedsupported Ms. Therefore, Woodhouse Nepinak. Therefore, Some chiefs threatened Ottawa with a long and hot summerwhile others are considering judicial disputes. Furthermore, Others, finally, support the bill.

First Nations join Canadians in the fight against Trump’s illegal prices.. . But Canada will not gain by compromising its rights, backing on reconciliation and ignoring legitimate environmental concerns.

Accelerated adoption bill c-5: "nothing new – Accelerated adoption bill c-5: "nothing new

Accelerated adoption bill c-5: "nothing – Accelerated adoption bill c-5: "nothing – Accelerated adoption bill c-5: "nothing new

Measures exceptional. unprecedented

Even if the bill was approved by the upper chamber. senators fiercely opposed it, most of them invoking the rights of natives. Some of them proposed amendments whose adoption would have delayed the bill, but they were all rejected.

The bill itself stipulates that the government will recognize. will affirm. will respect The constitutional rights of indigenous peoples when he plans to accelerate the adoption of a project.

However. accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing new some leaders fear that the process of consulting First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities to be inadequate, because Mr. Carney campaigned for decision -making within two years. These leaders want what is called the prior, free and informed consent be protected in the indigenous legal field.

Open in full screen

Paul Prosper. Senator Mi’kmaq of Nova Scotia. led to the bill during a speech delivered to the Chamber on Thursday, citing other First Nations leaders who estimated that Bill accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing new C-5 was not a reconciliationbut a treason of it.

While saying that he generally supports development, Mr. Prosper said that he did not want to quickly adopt a bill that was criticized by certain accelerated adoption. bill c-5: “nothing indigenous leaders. as the product of an inadequate consultation with the communities concerned.

He said the bill could allow the government. the industry to flout the rights of the Aboriginal people during the construction of a project.

No one wants to see our children grow up in misery.. without access to drinking water. without the possibility of well -paid jobs and without support for our patients and our dying. However, we do not want success and progress to be at the expense of indigenous peoples.

We want to be at the negotiating table. make decisions alongside Canadian politicians because these decisions concern us. They affect our land and our resourcesadded Mr. Prosper.

Mr. Prosper declared that it accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing is the responsibility of the Senate to defend the interests. of regions. minorities. that there is no reason to rush after a relatively short time to study the provisions of bill C-5 and their possible consequences.

He added that his office had received racist. insulting telephone calls since he announced his desire to amend Bill C-5 or slow down their adoption.

The racist remarks. the threats that my office was the subject were so intense that the staff asked for permission not to. answer the unknown calls. It is unacceptablehe said.

Brian Francis. Senator Mi’kmaq of Prince accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing new Edward Island. said that there was no guarantee that the economic benefits promised for accelerated projects be distributed fairly with Aboriginal peoples. He added that a rushed adoption of the bill could ultimately delay projects due to the risk of prosecution. brought by natives.

Are we really in a crisis that would justify such exceptional and unprecedented measures? asked Mr. Francis.

Open in full screen

Other senators wondered if the so rapid adoption of bill C-5 was necessary. Speaking of economic threats. senator Bernadette Clement said: We sometimes have the accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing new impression of an emergency, but is this really the case?

To grow our economy. build our accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing nation, yes, is urgent. This requires a quick. effective response, but it does not imply flouting the rights of Aboriginal people and our environmental protections.

To respond to the concerns of the natives. Carney said that he would personally lead mobilization sessions with rights holders this summer, starting with First Nations on July 17.

He indicated that they would meet in a spirit of consultation. cooperation. mobilizationand that the emphasis would be placed on the direct participation of Aboriginal people in major projects in order to share the potential wealth that could result from development.

With information from John Paul accelerated adoption bill c-5: “nothing new Tasker. CBC News