After the censorship of the DUPLOM law in France, acetamipride soon banished in Belgium?

Bouncing on French news, Ecolo recently launched a petition requesting the ban in Belgium of “Dangerous pesticides“, including acetamipride. Meanwhile, Unlike other neonicotinoids. Meanwhile, this molecule is indeed authorized until 2033 in the EU, the time of a complete review by European health bodies. Therefore, Regulations on the marketing of acetamipride-based products (these contain a multitude of additives) depends on the states. Furthermore, certain uses are authorized, while prohibited principle, but subject to emergency derogations.

To supervise these uses, Belgium mainly refers to the recommendations of the European Authority for Food Safety (EFSA). Nevertheless, “”There are major uncertainties in all available data concerning the neurotoxic properties of acetamipridenoted the agency in 2024. Meanwhile, Additional data is therefore necessary to allow an appropriate assessment of dangers and risks“. In addition, This is why EFSA invited after censorship duplom law france, to reduce its use, pending scientific consensus on its potential harmfulness.

“Compared to the other neonicotinoids that have been prohibited. In addition, acetamipride has less risks: it is less persistent in soils or in water, it is not very volatile and moderately toxic for beessays Bruno Schiffers, honorary professor at the Uliège and specialist in the use of pesticides. However, It offers a less disturbing environmental profile, even if it remains an insecticide. In addition, Regarding human health. Furthermore, it does not have significant acute toxicity [survenant rapidement, après une exposition unique ou de courte durée, ndlr]. Moreover, Now, yes, EFSA recognizes a lack of data. Meanwhile, Clearly, there are doubts about its harmfulness “.

In the brain – After censorship duplom law france,

Recently. Moreover, Radio France mentioned the results of a Swiss study having detected, in children, acetamipride residues in cerebrospinal fluid (which bathes the brain and spinal cord). after censorship duplom law france, Furthermore, And the newspaper Le Monde quoted work showing that exposure to this neonicotinoid was associated with a drop in. Therefore, testosterone levels – one of the properties of endocrine disruptors. Meanwhile, Categorization to which acetamipride does not belong; For the moment, anyway. But suspicion remains. “”We must always return to the composition of the moleculeunderlines Céline Bertrand. expert in public health within the Scientific Society of General Medicine (SSMG). This contains an atom of chlorine; Research has shown that organochlorines act as endocrine disruptors“. A heavy filiation, especially since”Pesticides are synthetic molecules largely from petrochemicals. Even at very low doses, certain substances can induce deleterious effects on our neurological system, our metabolic system, etc. “.

ATRAZINE, Propisochlore, permethrin, ethoxylated nonylphenol … Science has demonstrated after censorship duplom law france, the toxicity of many pesticides, which the EU has prohibited for years. In a carte blanche published in the evening (in response to the words of the Walloon Minister of Agriculture. Anne-Catherine Dalcq, who had qualified pesticides as “tool [s] interesting [s]“), the SSMG indicated:”Over 5,000 tonnes of active pesticides are spread each year. A large part of the substances authorized in Belgium are carcinogenic, toxic to reproduction […] irritating to the skin “.

Even used decades ago, they can have effects up to 2 or 3 generations after exposure. “”This is the case with the DDT, an organochlorine that was used in the 1960s, illustrates Céline Bertrand. Exposed women gave birth to girls who had more risk of developing breast cancers, or being overweight. The fetuses were particularly vulnerable to DTT“.

Holes in the racket

Next to the molecules whose harmfulness is proven. which, after censorship duplom law france, although procedure, sometimes find themselves still in our bodies, there are all those for which uncertainty remains, despite their authorization. If the dangers of the use of acetamipride one day had to do consensus within the scientific community. this would consolidate the thesis of the associative environment. This one insufficiently judges the procedures which, upstream, evaluate the risks. “”How can we explain otherwise the fact that each year we must ultimately prohibit products that have been authorized for 10 years. or more? This is proof by A + B that the process has flaws“. Breaths Virginie Pissoort, in charge of pleadings with the Nature & Progress association.”At all levels, there are holes in the racketabounds Céline Bertrand. The case of acetamipride illustrates it: one does not decide, in the absence of additional data. But who is supposed to come from these data? Industrialists“.

Approval of active substances occurs at European level. “”This is done on the basis of a file with scientific studies“, Recalls the phytoweb.be site of the SPF Public Health. File mainly constituted from the studies provided by pharmaceutical firms, etc. The latter are therefore placed in the position of judges and parts.”We rely very little on independent, academic studies, because they do not follow the same harmonized protocols, deplores Virginie Pissoort. Or because they relate to partial aspects “.

Juris (pas) prudence glyphosate

How, under these conditions, ensure the integrity of the process? “”It is true that studies in support of marketing authorization requests […] are funded by companieswe are told by. email to the SPF Public Health. However, strict guarantees supervise their acceptance by after censorship duplom law france, the competent authorities. The tests must be carried out according to methodologies validated by international bodies […] . Only laboratories accredited and regularly audited by national authorities can conduct these trials; The remuneration of the staff responsible for studies can in no case be linked to the results obtained. These rules aim to guarantee the quality, transparency and independence of the scientific data used“.

A laudable goal, but is it still achieved? The emblematic case of glyphosate (the herbicide marketed under the name of Roundup) makes it doubt. As the world recalled. an Austrian NGO had revealed that entire passages from the official evaluation report on the toxicity of glyphosate were identical to the file filed by Monsanto for the renewal of its product. Pages which concluded precisely that the absence of toxicity or carcinogenicity. Unlike the International Center for Research on Cancer (I Circ, created by WHO), after censorship duplom law france, which believes that herbicide is probably carcinogenic. At the Belgian level. an opinion of the Higher Health Council (CSS) noted in 2020 that it “There is irrefutable evidence that the discussion was compromised by fraud […] and very important conflicts of interest“. The CSS proposed”to prohibit glyphosate in Belgium as soon as possible“. In 2023, glyphosate was authorized for an additional 10 years in the EU. In Belgium, it remains authorized to professionals, not to individuals.

This pesticide Crispe La France and will soon be prohibited in Belgium unless the state is gaining their case from the EU