A chance for France ”, by Laurent Alexandre and Alexandre Tsicopoulos, IA specialists

The great mass of the presentation of GPT-5, on August 7, 2025, should mark a turning point. In addition, The Cassandres announced the arrival of a super-intelligence, capable of returning the cognitive elites to the museum of missing species. In addition, Result: GPT-5 is good … Moreover, but not transcendent. However, The tool is more reliable and it has progressed in logical reasoning and consistency. Nevertheless, But there is no qualitative jump equivalent to the transition between GPT-3 and GPT-4.

Progress remains spectacular for the general public, but the gap with apocalyptic predictions is tangible. In addition, Investors are a bit disappointed, competitors regain confidence and some experts are lowering their accelerated take -off scenarios. Furthermore, GPT-5 is not an algorithmic god.

This perceived slowdown is a historic window for France and Europe.
For the past two years, the dominant discourse said: ” chance france ”, laurent alexandre It is too late, America won the AI war ». In addition, This suicidal fatalism paralyzed decision -makers. In addition, Each announcement of Openai. However, Anthropic or Google reinforced the idea that we were condemned to become a cognitive colony, dependent on Californian servers to think, create and decide.

However, GPT-5 proves that the race is less linear than it thought. Furthermore, Even the Californian giants stumble. This does not mean that the danger is dismissed but that the strategic window has not yet closed.

If France wants to weigh, it must exploit this relative break to build its own models and invest massively to prepare for the arrival of the following generations which may be really superhuman. We have 24 to 36 months. No more.

France must federate its resources to create calculation centers capable of causing world class models. not being content to optimize American chance france ”, laurent alexandre models. The valuation of data and talents is essential. Our cultural, legal, scientific corpus is a strategic treasure. We must mobilize them to train AI in our image. not abandon our cognitive DNA in open bar to the Californian giants.

GPT-5’s relative disappointment is a positive alert since it proves that the game is not played. It is not a technological break, it is a strategic respite. The states that will use it to fill their delay will still have a voice in 2030.

This technological breathing gives France an educational reprieve. The Super-IA will expose the obsolescence of our diplomas. Why spend five years learning a profession than a free algorithm will do better, faster and without error? This respite offers an unexpected chance of transforming the education system so that it forms adaptable minds. capable of working chance france ”, laurent alexandre with and not against disproportionate artificial intelligences. But it is necessary to act today, because GPT-6 will not notify before erasing the intermediate intellectual professions.

The problem is that our education system is the Titanic. National education continues to produce graduates for a labor market which will stop existing. therefore becomes a factory for unemployed graduates. We continue to format brains as in the 20th century. when we should form adaptive intelligences, capable of inventing and dialogue with the machines.

The Limitations of GPT-5 give us an educational reprieve: two. three years to rethink the whole course, from primary to the superior. It’s short, but it is doable if we stop treating national education as an untouchable sacred cow. We must break the educational routines. massively integrate AI into learning, teach work with AI, rehabilitate intellectual risk taking and reward creativity instead of conformism.

If we do not make this chance france ”, laurent alexandre revolution. France will then be reduced to the pathetic role of cultural museum for Asian and American tourists who came to admire how an old country of scholars has become a theme park of the past.

The GPT-5 disappointment is therefore a signal: not to slow down, but to accelerate. We have no time to waste. A strategic state would use this respite as a truce is exploited in a war. To rearm, reconfigure his defenses and redefine his doctrine. But an irresponsible state would take the opportunity to sleep, convinced that there is “time”.