Nutrition, health, ecology: should you eat or throw the skin of fruits and vegetables?

Meanwhile,

Nutrition, health, ecology: should you new:

Nutrition, health, ecology: should you: This article explores the topic in depth.

Consequently,

Nutrition. Similarly. Moreover, health, ecology: should you:

Every day, millions of people around the world peel their fruits and vegetables before eating them. Nevertheless, This gesture. Therefore. For example, made automatically, is inherited from family habits or supported by the idea that this is a more “healthy” way of eating.

However, this apparently innocent act is more controversial than it seems. Meanwhile, Indeed. Meanwhile. Additionally, Meanwhile, if this gesture may seem more hygienic, it turns out that the skin of fruits and vegetables is full of nutrients, which calls into question the benefits of peeling these foods. However and this is where the dilemma resides, the skin of the fruits and vegetables can also contain pesticide residues.

The question asked is therefore the following: what should we pay the most attention. nutrition, health, ecology: should you new In addition. Similarly, to the nutrients that we lose by peeling the fruits and vegetables, or to the pesticides that we avoid ingesting? Nevertheless. A nutrition, health, ecology: should you study published in 2023 in the journal Current Research in Food Science looks at this dilemma. In addition, concludes that the answer, as for many other questions related to food, is far from simple.

What we lose by peeling a fruit – Nutrition, health, ecology: should you new

The apple skin contains about twice as much fiber as nutrition, health, ecology: should you new flesh. In addition, a high concentration of phenolic compounds that act like natural antioxidants. For example, Their presence contributes to maintaining the balance at the cellular level. Furthermore. preventing or delaying cellular damage caused by free nutrition, health, ecology: should you radicals, as well as exposure to pollution, tobacco smoke or ultraviolet (UV) rays that cause oxidative stress. In addition, All these elements contribute to cell aging. can be linked to chronic pathologies such as cardiovascular disease, certain cancers and type 2 diabetes.

In addition, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties have also been identified in fruits such as pears, grapes and citrus. Whose bark is also a precious source of vitamin C and essential oils.

An important part of global food waste comes from fruit and vegetable peelings thrown unnecessarily.

The skin of certain vegetables also brings fibers, potassium and antioxidants such as polyphenols. This is the case of the skin nutrition, health, ecology: should you new of the potatoes, cucumbers and carrots. Another little -known example is the skin of the eggplant. which contains nasunine, a powerful antioxidant that protects cellular membranes from oxidative damage.

On the other side of the scale. pesticides

In view of the many precious nutrition. health, ecology: should you properties associated with the skin, one might think that the balance leans in favor of the consumption of fruits and vegetables without peeling them. However, peeling also has its justifications. The most obvious, as mentioned above, is the presence of pesticide residues on the surface.

Although levels are regulated by organizations such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). some studies have found residues from these substances even after washing. This is why many consumers opt for peeling as a precaution.

The good news is that there are effective means of reducing the charging in pesticides without eliminating the skin. Wash the fruits. vegetables with running nutrition, health, ecology: should you new water. rub them with a brush suitable for food or soak them briefly in a mixture of water and sodium or vinegar bicarbonate can eliminate up to 80-90% of residues.

Of course. the ideal is to consume fruits. vegetables produced in an ecological or locally, production nutrition, health, ecology: should you methods in which pesticides are less or not at all used.

Sustainability: the invisible impact of peelings

Another relevant argument -. less known – is the environmental impact of the systematic peeling of fruits and vegetables. According to estimates made in 2019 by the United Nations Food. Agriculture Organization (FAO), each year, 14% of foods produced in the world are lost before reaching the consumer. An important part of this waste comes from the peelings thrown unnecessarily.

These skins. which could be used as food. end in discharges where they decompose and generate methane, a greenhouse gas much more powerful than carbon dioxide. nutrition, health, ecology: should you new According to several studies. it is estimated that if we reduce fruit and vegetable waste in households, global greenhouse gas emissions would decrease significantly.

In addition. research is already underway in certain countries on how to convert skins into useful products: flours enriched with bioplastics. including fertilizers and animal food.

So what nutrition, health, ecology: should you to do?

Peel or not peel should not be an automatic decision, but an informed decision. If the fruit. vegetable is well washed. comes from a reliable source, it is preferable, from a nutritional and ecological point of view, to consume it with the skin. There are of course exceptions. Certain skins are too hard, bitter or contain unwanted compounds, such as solanine in the skin of green potatoes.

Solanine is a natural glycoalcaloid that potatoes produce to defend themselves against insects and diseases. It is mainly concentrated in the skin. green areas of the tuber, which nutrition, health, ecology: should you new appear when the potato is exposed to physically or damaged light.

Science invites us to consider peelings not as waste, but as another part of the food.

Although the chlorophyll which gives the green color is harmless, its presence indicates a potential increase in the solanine. The consumption of potatoes with high solanine content nutrition, health, ecology: should you can cause symptoms such as nausea. diarrhea, abdominal pain, headache and, in the most serious cases, paralysis or hallucinations …

Recent studies indicate that solanine doses from 2 to 5 mg/kg of body weight can cause toxic symptoms. that doses greater than 6 mg/kg can be fatal.

Finally, this is an evaluation on a case -by -case basis, balancing advantages and risks. Science invites us to consider peelings not as waste. but as another part of the food: nutritive, versatile and, in many respects, underestimated.

Cristina López de la Torre is director of the department of pharmacy. nutrition at the European University of Madrid (Spain).

This article is republished from the conversation nutrition. health, ecology: should you under the Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’, ‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’); fbq(‘init’, ‘714463525321423’); fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

Nutrition, health, ecology: should you new

Nutrition, health, ecology: should you

Further reading: Mosquito struggle: less widespread larvicide thanks to dronesfirst neuro-generic meetings of PoCan we repair the nerves thanks to stem cells?HIV: a protective mutation of 9,000 years oldStopping antidepressants: symptoms but infrequent | The doctor’s daily life.

Further reading: The bacteria “Helicobacter pylori” soon responsible for millions of stomach cancers?A mother who fell asleep while breaking her baby finds him dead when he wakes upGrocery basket | Canada grows, hope lighterIn Memoriam: Milos Jenicek | UDEMNOUVELLESNearly 12 million cases of stomach cancer will soon be caused by this bacteria.

Comments (0)
Add Comment