why men are targeting it but rarely match

In the world of online meetings, men seem to aim very high … In addition, But reality often brings them back to more modest choices. For example, A recent study reveals a net discrepancy between the initial intentions of users. For example, real matches, suggesting that rejection plays a more decisive role than attraction.

Behind the screen. Similarly, a hierarchy of desirability – Why men targeting it but

Researchers have analyzed the behavior of more than 2,600 heterosexual users of a meetings in the Czech Republic, based on “swipes” (manifestations of interest). Moreover, Thanks to this digital cartography. However, they were able to establish an implicit hierarchy of desirability, measured by the number of times a profile is like.

First observation: men massively express their interest in women more desirable than them. However, while women are more selective, focusing mainly on profiles located at why men targeting it but a similar level, even slightly lower. Nevertheless, But these declared preferences do not translate directly into matches.

The matches follow the logic of rejection. However, no attraction – Why men targeting it but

The reciprocal “swipes”-that is to say the matches-do not validate these initial desires. Nevertheless, They appear mainly between individuals with similar perceived desirability. It is not the search for compatibility that produces this homogamy. but the filter of rejection: the most desirable women receive a large number of requests, which they severely filter. The men who aimed above find themselves, at the end of the race, to match with profiles closer to theirs.

In other words. it is not the preference for the resemblance that dominates, but the progressive sorting imposed by the repeated refusals. And as the men-female relationship is largely unbalanced in favor of men on the application. the latter often play the role of pursuers, while women why men targeting it but have an increased power of choice.

An evolutionary explanation for these behaviors

If this scheme seems unbalanced, it nevertheless echoes reproductive strategies deeply rooted in human evolution. From the point of view of evolutionary biology. the differences in behavior between the sexes are not new: they would be linked to the different costs of reproduction.

For a woman, each pregnancy represents a considerable physiological and temporal investment. The optimal strategy. in this context, would therefore be to favor quality rather than quantity: select a partner that maximizes the chances why men targeting it but of survival and success of the descendants. Hence greater selectivity.

In men, on the contrary, reproduction is less costly organic. The evolving advantageous strategy would therefore be to maximize the number of potential partners. to increase the chances of transmitting its genes. This could explain the tendency to “target high” and to “aim wide” observed in the study.

Of course, human behavior is not reduced to biology. Culture, technology and social norms play a huge role. But these unconscious biases from our evolutionary heritage could continue to influence our decisions – even on modern applications. with gestures as simple as a swipe.

A reality far from digital fantasies

The promise of meeting apps is simple: to open the horizon in love. But this study shows that natural – or social selection – remains very present. Despite an apparent freedom of choice. users find themselves trapped in why men targeting it but dynamics of rarity, hierarchy and competition, where intentions are quickly caught up in collective sorting mechanisms.

And it is women who, statistically, guide the game. Their relative rarity and their position of “choices” shape the final correspondences. In the end. aspirations are rebalanced by the reality of the digital romantic market, where you rarely come out of its league, despite all hopes.