Nevertheless,
Dieselgate: third aggravated deception trial:
The Paris prosecutor’s office requested a third trial for aggravated deception in the dieselgate scandal against Renault. Therefore, after those already requested against Volkswagen and Peugeot-Citroën, while the manufacturer in the diamond disputes any offense.
Renault is suspected of having “specially calibrated” EURO 5. Furthermore, Euro 6 standards vehicles, marketed between 2009 and 2017, so that they respect the regulatory parameters during approval tests but not in normal situations, according to these requisitions, taken on June 25 and of which AFP was aware on Friday.
This alleged deception would be aggravated by the fact that this calibration was able to increase atmospheric pollution to nitrogen oxides. therefore “promote (…) the appearance in humans of respiratory diseases”.
The final decision on a trial belongs to the investigating judge, in this file rich in abundant technical dieselgate: third aggravated deception trial exchanges.
Solicited on Friday. a spokesperson for Renault, indicted in June 2021, told AFP that the brand “disputes having committed the slightest offense and recalls that its vehicles are not equipped with fraud software with depollution devices.”
“Renault vehicles have all. always been approved in accordance with the French and European laws and regulations in force during their marketing,” it was guaranteed.
Renault also underlines that “a judgment of the Court of Cassation” of April 2024. whose prosecution “pretends to ignore existence”, “calls into question the validity of the procedure”.
This judgment focused on central legal expertise in the file.
“These requisitions therefore constitute an attempt to interfere in the decision that the investigation chamber will soon be rendered” of the Paris Court of Appeal on this file. criticism Renault.
– “assumed strategy” –
Initially implicated dieselgate: third aggravated deception trial but understood as witness by the judges in May 2021. the former boss of Renault Carlos Ghosn had rejected all responsibility.
For the prosecutor in charge of this file. however, “all the declarations of the teams working on the design of diesel engines within Renault tended to demonstrate that the objective in terms of depollution was to pass the +standard, by limiting de facto +the norm +to the approval protocol” while “this standard had to find itself in normal conditions of use”.
The public prosecutor evokes an “assumed optimization strategy”, taken in a “collegial” manner.
At this stage. 381 civil parties were formed, individuals, associations, public persons, including the cities of Paris, Lyon, Montpellier or Grenoble, and private companies.
– “compensation” –
The prosecution underlines. however, that there are “many others” potential, while the repression of fraud mentioned nearly 900,000 dieselgate: third aggravated deception trial vehicles sold for a single type of diesel engine questioned, for a turnover of 16.85 billion euros.
Above all. the public prosecutor says “that obviously, a consumer who turns to Renault”, a manufacturer with “the excellent reputation, does not expect that his vehicle does not comply with European standards in terms of polluting emissions”.
The dieselgate scandal broke out in the mid-2010s in the United States after Vokswagen admitted to having equipped more than 11 million vehicles sold between 2009. 2015 software limiting pollution during approval tests.
The public health center of the Paris prosecutor’s office has already required two trials for aggravated deception on February 24 against Volkswagen. June 25 for Peugeot and Citroën.
These files must be judged “without further delay” for “the victims of the fraudulent acts of industrialists” to obtain “responses”. be “compensated”, told AFP François Lafforgue, lawyer dieselgate: third aggravated deception trial for future generations.
This is “a question of public health that concerns us all, exposed for years to toxic programs (…). The civil parties will not hesitate. at the time of the trial, to claim compensation up to the challenges” indicated for their part Marc Barennes and Romain Boulet, advice from individuals and businesses.
“We congratulate ourselves on what the procedures are advancing in coherence with the investigation. ” said Charles Constantin-Vallet, lawyer for the Confederation of Housing, Consumption and Living Executive (CLCV). He regretted “however too long judicial deadlines”.
Posted on July 11 at 5:26 p.m., AFP
Dieselgate: third aggravated deception trial
Further reading: Scam alert: Discover these formidable phone calls to which to respond could cost thousands of euros in just a few seconds – Farewell to mobile service, hello mobity, the new parcometer application in Montreal – The institutional trap that awaits Elon Musk and his dream of a third party in the United States – Rts.ch – Geneva Airport: increase in attendance with holidays – SFR sale: the rumor machine gets carried away.
