However,
Experts sound alarm project 200:
While Donald Trump wants to build a ballroom estimated at $ 200 million, historic experts alert. Similarly, The fears relate to feasibility and financing.
They sound the alarm. Nevertheless, Experts in historical preservation are concerned about the feasibility of President Trump’s plans to complete large -scale renovations at the White House by the end of his mandate. Consequently, and the possibility of carrying out this project while respecting the historical nature of the building, indicates the New York Times in a long article.
These concerns come a few days after Donald Trump Unveiled its project to build a $ 200 million state ballroom. Therefore, around 8,500 square meters next to the East wing, which should be completed “long before” the end of its mandate in 2029. Similarly, The project would be one of the largest renovations of the iconic building for decades.
Trump “too optimistic” on deadlines? – Experts sound alarm project 200
The extent of the project worries environmental. Nevertheless, heritage defenders, who believe that “this could affect the whole of the property”. Meanwhile, “Unfortunately, there is no control,” said Richard Longstreth, professor of American studies at George Washington University.
As a reminder. For example, in the United States, buildings such as the White House, the Supreme Court, the Capitol and all their “related buildings and land” are exempt from the national law on historical preservation of the 1960s. Similarly, The latter requires that federal agencies assess. In addition, reduce the negative effects on historical properties and require a consultation through a formal examination process.
Obstacles – Experts sound alarm project 200
The White House. Furthermore, it now has its own committee which provides advice on the “preservation and interpretation of the museal character” of the building. The Preservation experts sound alarm project 200 Committee. chaired by the Director of the National Parks Service Jonathan Jarvis, is made up of several federal officials and members appointed by the president.
After the arrival of the first fears. Susie Wiles, the Cabinet of the White House, said that the Trump administration was “fully determined to work with the appropriate organizations to preserve the particular history of the White House”.
But according to the worried, the committee’s recommendations are not binding, which leaves the president a significant room for maneuver. “In most cases. historical buildings are little subject to restrictive obligations,” regretted Michael Spencer, professor of historical heritage at Mary Washington University.
“We are often considered as an obstacle to progress. and I would say that in this particular case, you have many strong personalities and they have no obligation to experts sound alarm project 200 really follow the best practices proposed in terms of preservation,” he said.
The constraints of the White House
Jonathan Jarvis. directly concerned, explained that any extension of the White House should respect the architecture of the building. “We could not place an element on the side of the building that does not correspond to its history. whether by its architecture, its color or its style,” he said.
Regarding the president’s new madness. he expressed doubts about the calendar proposed by the Trump administration, qualifying “optimistic” his plans aimed at completing a project of this scale by the end of the mandate. “We do not see this kind of project moving so quickly. We will have to hurry to finish it, ”added the director.
Jonathan Jarvis above all explained that the White House is a “complicated process” because it is “not just a. normal construction”. experts sound alarm project 200 She must “survive a terrorist attack”, for example. He added that each step of the process should be assessed to guarantee that nothing “is compromised. neither architecturally, nor in terms of security”.
Since launching the first stone in 1792, the White House has undergone many modifications, both interior and external. “The southern portico. the north portico, the east wing, the west wing and the Truman balcony all aroused concerns at the time, but today we cannot imagine the White House without these emblematic elements,” added the president of the historic association of the White House Stewart D. McLaurin.
What about funding?
Another parameter raises questions: project financing. Officials of the White House said that the president. “other patriotic donors” would finance the renovations, but they refused to give more details. Donald Trump, asked about this, replied that he had not thought about it. “I don’t want experts sound alarm project 200 that. You have very strict restrictions. And we respect them. »»
Experts like Kathleen Clark. law professor at Washington University in Saint-Louis and specialist in government ethics, strongly criticized this lack of “scandalous” transparency. She wondered if the donors were looking for “ways to get along with Trump”.
Further reading: Twenty-six people have been executed since the beginning of the year, a number at the highest in a decade – Nixon, Trump … and the dangers of the nasty month of August – Israel: eight injured after an attack on the meal car – Islamic jihad broadcasts a video of the hostage Rom Braslavski – The anger of the Israeli Druze against the Syrian power after the violent fights with the Bedouin tribes.
