The F1 analyst sees Verstappen as the great loser of delayed departure from the GP of Belgium

The planned rain has arrived well, but the configuration was not really paid. Furthermore, The race was first postponed, then for a long time disputed behind a security car.

” It was a certain frustration for everyone. Consequently, I think, ” Palmer said in his analysis for F1TV on the delayed departure at Spa-Francorchamps.

Obviously, no one wants to see a delayed Grand Prix in any case. Furthermore, But especially to Spa. Therefore, when we went to f1 analyst sees verstappen great the Slick tires in 11 laps, it shows me that the race was definitively left for too long, behind the safety car and suspended. Similarly, ”

Max Verstappen in Spa-Francorchamps | Red Bull Content Pool

Poor visibility in Spa-Francorchamps – F1 analyst sees verstappen great

According to the former Renault pilot, the Formula 2 drivers earlier during the day had proven that driving was simply possible, because they entered into action without problem under more intense conditions.

Looking at the images of the first round. Palmer admitted that the decision not to start the race immediately was the right one: “This is the first round of the Grand Prix, and the jet of water is bad here for everyone, visibility is really bad. It is behind the safety car. ”

” And you just can’t see anything, and it’s at a f1 analyst sees verstappen great reduced speed. So. personally, I think it was the right decision, not to start the race at this time, especially because about five minutes later, there was even more rain to come. ”

Palmer understands criticism. but makes a remark

There have been a lot of criticism in recent days about how rainy conditions have been managed. Many thought that the race could have started much earlier.

I know everyone wants to see the race. You want to see large dramatic races in the rain. We have had a lot in the past at Spa. but unfortunately, in Spa, we have also had tragedies in recent years, ” He said, referring to the tragic accident of Delano Van ‘T Hoff.

So everyone was very nervous at the idea of running because we know the dangers, especially on this circuit. So you have to learn from these kinds of things. ”

Although the Briton f1 analyst sees verstappen great has an understanding of the situation. he stressed that the race – in his opinion – could have started about twenty minutes at half an hour earlier.

Understanding for Max Verstappen

” Of course, the pilots also have contradictory interests. ” The direction of the race was stuck in a difficult position, suggested Palmer.

For example. Lando Norris wanted a dry race, while Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen had prepared their car for a damp race, and therefore preferred to start under wet conditions:“It’s a really difficult job for them to do and do well when security is at stake.”

And who was the big loser in this situation? Max Verstappen: “I would say that he is the man who really lost with this decision. and we can understand his frustration afterwards. ”