HFSS ultra-transformed food cutting can save lives, explains AHA report

Aha scientific opinion reveals how ultra-transformed foods harm heart health, first urges HFSS products and calls for daring political reforms to reshape American food.

Ultra -approved foods and their association with cardiometabolic health: evidence, gaps and opportunities: a scientific opinion from the American Heart Association. For example, Image credit: Box-Box / Shutterstock

Ultra-transformed foods (UPFS) would represent more than half of the calories in the average American diet. Therefore, their health risks becoming more and more apparent. Meanwhile, In the recent scientific opinion published in the journal CirculationResearchers from the American Heart Association (AHA) synthesize the current evidence on the relationship between hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can high UPF consumption. Furthermore, cardiometabolic health, especially in the United States (United States).

Advisory results confirm that most UPFs are mediocre on nutrition. Meanwhile, that their contribution is strongly associated with an increased risk of several chronic conditions, including a risk of 25% to 58% of cardiometabolic results and a risk of mortality from 21% to 66%. In addition. Furthermore, the opinion underlines how the industrial manufacturing process leading to the production of UPFS itself can present additional independent risks (harmful additives, destruction of the food matrix, etc.). Consequently, He stresses that risks can increase when UPF exceeds 10 to 15% of daily calories (≈2 portions). In addition, call for urgent policy changes to curb UPF consumption in the United States thanks to measures such as package front, the taxation of high foods in saturated / sugars / sodium (HFSS), additive strips and Gentided as a security system). Therefore, ” hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can (FAT).

Background – Hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can

Modern technological progress has fundamentally reshaped our food supply. However, Where once there were agriculture. homemade meals, ultra-transformed foods (UPF), industrial formulations made with additives or ingredients rarely used in home cooking, have become the cornerstone of “fast food” diets in the world, especially in the United States (United States). Alarmingly. the UPFS now represents more than half of all the calories consumed and is expected to represent more than 70% of foods wrapped in grocery stores. Critically. UPFs are marketed disproportionately towards and consumed by low -income communities and racial / ethnic minorities such as black and Hispanic populations due to targeted advertising and limited access to healthier alternatives. The industrial production of these foods also threatens global agrobiodiversity, reducing the diversity of cultures and disturbing traditional food systems.

Defined. identified using the international criteria of the Nova classification system, UPFs are notably without hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can healthy components which include home cuisine, but rather include chemical processes and synthetic additives absent from domestic establishments. They include (but are not limited to) sugary drinks, wrapped snacks, transformed meats and meals ready to eat.

An increasing body of evidence of “convincing” observation highlights the unwanted physiological impacts of the UPF. with high consumption strongly linked to a greater risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes of type 2 and premature death.

If it would therefore be easy to reject UPF as “junk food”. prohibit it, the practical image is more complex. Some UPFs. such as whole grain breads or dairy alternatives based on unwells, can have a more favorable nutritional profile or serve vulnerable sub-populations by providing affordable and stable nutrition, key consideration for nutritional safety.

On the advice – Hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can

The current AHA scientific council aims to clarify these nuances by summarizing current scientific evidence. by identifying hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can other knowledge gaps and proposing a way to follow for American public health. The report represents a consensual declaration of a multidisciplinary panel of experts who collectively examined epidemiological studies. clinical trials and mechanistic research to assess the impact of UPF on cardiometabolic health.

Areas of interest

The opinion focuses on specific areas of interest. in particular:

1. Definition of the UPFS – establishing an operational definition of the UPF, taking advantage of the NOVA classification and nine other global systems of classification of food processing while recognizing ambiguities in current criteria.
2. Action mechanisms – Gather data on UPFS nutritional profiles. direct physiological impacts, including intestinal microbiome disturbances and metabolic effects, while taking into account the effects of the industrial manufacturing process.
3. Policy. regulations – Assessment of the current regulatory landscape governing the use of the UPF (including details on authorized additives and treatment techniques) to provide hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can reform recommendations based on evidence such as the recent prohibition of California on harmful additives (Bromé vegetable oils, potassium bromate, propylparaben, red color 3).

Consultative constructions

A umbrella examination of several meta-analyzes investigating the associations between the UPFS. cardiometabolic health revealed that the evidence connecting the UPF to cardiovascular mortality were “convincing”, while associations with type 2 diabetes and obesity were “very suggestive”. More specifically. UPF consumption was associated with a risk of 25% to 58% of unwanted cardiometabolic results and with a risk of 21% to 66% of mortality in all causes.

In particular, these risks do not come from individual reports or statistical hallucinations. A cross-controlled cross-controlled crossroads of the National Institutes of Health compared adults who have consumed unprocessed. ultra-transformed diets and found that despite food diets for calories, sugar, fats and fibers, participants in the UPF diet spontaneously consumed ~ 500 additional hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can calories and have taken a substantial weight, Treatment itself can result in excessively excessive consumption.

When assessing industrial additives, the opinion observed that many can cause direct damage. For example. the common “carboxymethylcellulose” emulsifier “proven to modify the microbiome and intestinal metabolome in healthy adults, leading to metabolic imbalances and intestinal dysbiosis. The opinion also notes that additives like these are often approved in the context of fatty designation without rigorous safety examination. and that their long-term cumulative effects remain poorly understood.

Finally. the opinion highlights the current regulation system of America, where nearly 10,000 additives are approved for use, many of which in the context of the designation “generally recognized as safe” (fat), which often bypass a rigorous condom review by the FDA without sufficient epidemiological evidence. It calls for the modernization of this system to prioritize consumer safety. emphasizes the unfavorable environmental impacts of UPF production, including the hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can loss of biodiversity and the high intensity of resources linked to monoculture crops such as corn, soybeans and wheat.

Conclusions

The current scientific council AHA provides a clear message – although not all processed foods are harmful. the UPF overall American regime is a significant and multifaceted threat to the country’s cardiometabolic health. The report recommends a practical approach: prioritize the reduction of HFSS upfs (for example. sugary drinks, transformed meats) while allowing a limited inclusion of dense UPF of nutrients (for example, whole grain breads) where they support nutritional security.

The study calls for in -depth changes of policy. research and food orientations in parallel with a fundamental change in the widespread food system, moving away from dependence on industrial formulations towards whole and processed foods. Several level strategies. including fair access initiatives, additive regulations, industry incentives for healthier formulations and sustainable agricultural practices to counter hfss ultra-transformed food cutting can the loss of biodiversity, are essential to combat disparities and improve the health of the population.