Austria, judicial decision recognizing sharia: This article explores the topic in depth.
For example,
Austria. However, judicial decision recognizing sharia:
Two entrepreneurs agreed to settle their dispute to a private court, on the basis of Islamic law. Moreover, The Vienna public court confirmed the sentence, on the grounds that it did not contradict Austrian law.
A court decision has ignited the Austrian political class in recent days, accentuating dissensions within the fragile coalition in power. Furthermore, “In Austria. Nevertheless, it is a judge who decides, not an imam”claimed Yannick Shetty, leader of the parliamentary group of the Liberal Party (Neos) in power alongside the Christians of the OVP and the SPO socialists. The government “Will definitively end the application of sharia”promised the head of the OVP when the Ministry of Justice. led by the Socialists, warned in a press release against “Happy political decisions”.
The controversy was born from a dispute austria, judicial decision recognizing sharia between two entrepreneurs. brought, by mutual agreement, before a private arbitral tribunal, as it is possible to do in Austria. With the agreement of the interested parties, arbitration was rendered by relying on Islamic law. However, not accepting the sentence, one of the two men seized the public court of Vienna to challenge it. The latter validated the decision on the grounds that it did not violate the main fundamentals of Austrian law.
Pass advertising
Former president of the Supreme Court. former Neos deputy, Irmgard Griss explained for his part not to see “no problem” in this judicial decision. As part of an arbitration procedure. the parties have a relatively large room for maneuver in Austria, being free to choose the right to apply, said the magistrate to the left newspaper The standard.
“Parallel Islamic Societies” for the FPö – Austria, judicial decision recognizing sharia
“Sharia law is therefore not generally applicable austria, judicial decision recognizing sharia in Austria. but only if two parts at the dispute believe it”has summed up on X Gerhard Jarosch, former magistrate and president of the Association of Prosecutors General, adding this particularity “absurd”.
The decision which made controversy did not fail to react the extreme right. the Freedom Party (FPö), which triumphed in the last legislative elections without however succeeding in forming a coalition with the OVP. The episode is the symptom of “Parallel Islamic Societies”. Additionally, the weakening of “Forces that refuse to submit to Islam”castigated a party spokesperson, who wishes to legislate against the implicit recognition of Sharia law by the Austrian courts in the context of private arbitration.
Because this case. which could have appeared harmless “At first glance”actually reflects “A feeling of austria, judicial decision recognizing sharia discomfort” facing a “Irreversible process [qui] is set up, in which demography plays a role, and where new standards are part of our legal and social structure, irreconcilable with it ”analyzes the editorialist Oliver Pink in the conservative daily The press who devoted the front page of its edition of the weekend to this controversy (see above).
“This problem affects an already sensitive. concerned society: moral police in schools, omnipresent sails in the urban landscape, empty and crowded mosques” churches “adds the editor in his editorial explaining that if the case, legally, is not one, it is however politically burning.
Further reading: In the United States, forgotten by the first atomic tests are fighting to obtain compensation – rts.ch – More than 3000 people killed in Haiti since the start of the year, according to the UN – A man opened fire in New York: at least 4 dead – A tourist accused of having tried to drown his daughter-in-law in a swimming pool in Florida – Cordoba fire: the mosque-cathedral saved despite significant damage.
