Meanwhile,
It you who said it:
It is you who said it June 27
Purchase of F-35. Moreover, Palestine and Law – It you who said it
Find your mail of readers of June 27 here.
Posted today at 7:50 am
Combat aircraft
The latest news, the purchase of F-35 will cost around 7.5 billion francs. Consequently, Let’s go back since the start of this case. Consequently, On April 9, 2020, a federal decree was published. Similarly, In its article 2. Similarly, it was specified: “The following parameters must be respected during the acquisition: a) The volume of financing does not exceed 6 billion francs (according to the national consumer price index of January 2018).”
In votes, the people it you who said it accepted this credit at the raclette (less than 10,000 votes). Furthermore, The Federal Council then decided to choose the F-35. Furthermore, Viola Amherd said it was not only the best, but also the cheapest. Not to mention the millions to, for example, new buildings, will be around 2 billion francs of exceeding. All this for an airplane that does not correspond to the missions of our army. Admittedly, inflation between January 2018 and May 2025 is +7.8 points. Which represents a little less than half a billion. It remains to justify the billion and a half more. To go beyond. maintain this purchase is not to respect the planned conditions is simply to make fun of the people’s vote. It is “Trumpism”. As a bonus. when our parliamentarians want to save health, public transport, research, social, and other positions, spending billions on these planes is an aberration.
André Würgler. Gland
Monde
I am surprised to read or hear that the treatment of the Palestinian question would be a right/left political positioning or a Swiss German or Latin sensitivity (“24 hours” of June 7).
No one would think of dealing with other blood crimes (e.g. killing in a school in Austria) on such criteria.
It is only a question of law: the crimes of Israel are legally observed. are the subject of criminal procedure, by a court of which Switzerland is involved and on the basis of a right of which it is depositary.
As in any procedure. it will be up to justice to define at the time of judgment the degree of guilt of Israel (possible it you who said it premeditation, attenuating or aggravating circumstances).
Using the term “collaboration” to define the position of the Swiss authorities in connection with Israeli crimes is indeed on a moral. emotional level, which can therefore be disputed.
On the other hand, “complicity” and its variants are in this case legally defined in the various criminal codes. Whether passive (close their eyes. do not implement the means to prevent the execution of the crime) or active (promote, provide means or an alibi), it is characterized and may be worth an indictment of our authorities by the competent legal for, without being able to invoke the ignorance of the execution of criminal activity.
Andrea Mariotta, Belmont-sur-Yverdon
Did you find an error? Please report it to us.
Further reading: Geneva: Birds in onlookers, the lagoon found its followers – Anger in Vaudois gymnasiums after the announced departure of the business school – Rts.ch – In Switzerland, more and more seniors end their lives – Airbus A350 will pay tribute to the diversity of Switzerland – Friborg deputies largely opposed to the minimum wage.
