A judgment which could now be invoked by the defense of Grégory Lenoci, for an obvious reason …
He decides to do justice himself
As a reminder, the case broke out on July 24 when Gregory Lenoci published a video of a few seconds. We see a man lying on the ground, Marc P., bloody, unable to react. Gregory Lenoci accuses him of pedophile acts on his stepson.
Another video is broadcast the same evening. Gregory Lenoci takes the floor directly: “I had to do what I did. I warned customs. I warned everyone. This guy came to my house. He did my family in the air …”
Leaving the unconscious person, Gregory Lenoci warned emergencies before fleeing, then going to the authorities this Wednesday.
This Monday, The future revealed that another father, who does not know Gregory Lenoci, reported the same type of fact to the Namur police on June 29.
He had accused Marc P. of touching up on his daughter. “I was heard immediately by the inspectors”he had explained to us. “Three days later, my child was auditioned by the manure brigade. […] Then I was asked to remain silent so as not to interfere with the investigation. “
But the weeks pass. And the garage of Marc P. remains open, with – according to this witness – the children of the neighborhood who continue to come “Playing the console or receiving gifts”. Until the day when, 48 hours after complaining, Gregory Lenoci decides to do justice himself.
Negligence in the investigation?
This Thursday evening, the first dad to have given the alert on June 29 is bitter. “I am disgusted with justice and our police officers, because they had to act and catch ithe explains to us “By tapping his name, they would have seen his judicial past. However, he respected any of his conditions. For more than a year that my daughter was hanging out with the pedophile. The story could have been so different.”
The conditions mentioned by this father are those linked to the stay enjoyed by Marc P. so as not to serve his prison sentence. The pedophile had to refrain from frequenting minors. However, Marc P. welcomed the children of the neighborhood in his garage …
Didn’t Marc P.’s history should have been pushing for his arrest on June 29? Was there, from this date, a suspicion that the conditions linked to the stay had not been respected?
How to explain that after the second complaint, filed on July 22, Marc P. was not really put out of contact with children?
On the side of the Namur prosecution, we refuse any comment“In the interest of the investigation”. But it is emphasized that “The instruction was carried out, from the first complaint, with speed”. On the other hand, he does not doubt that the defense of Gregory Lenoci will seize these disturbing facts …
