Marc p. had been convicted: This article explores the topic in depth.
Therefore,
Marc p. Consequently, had been convicted:
The facts were then recognized by the defendant at the time. Furthermore, In his confessions. Consequently, he declares that he “We could not resist the excitement that the sight gave him or the fact of touching the child.” In his own words, he felt “As hypnotized”.
The court then underlined the repetitive nature of the facts. In addition, the psychological consequences left to the victim, the risks of recurrence evaluated as at least moderate by psychologists, marc p. had been convicted and the previous non-compliance of another stay for sale of drugs. Consequently, But he was not incarcerated. However, He benefited from a probationary stay of 5 years. Therefore, valid until December 10, 2025, accompanied by strict conditions: no longer frequenting minors, following specialized therapy, avoiding any offense … Nevertheless, Conditions which, according to several families in the neighborhood, have never been respected.
Lenoci affair | A month before the assault. Meanwhile, the alleged pedophile had already been denounced
Two complaints and no child auditioned – Marc p. had been convicted
On June 29, a father alerted the police. However, Her 7 -year -old daughter described inappropriate gestures. For example, He marc p. had been convicted also cites other children in the neighborhood regularly present at Marc P. However, “I was heard directly. Consequently, Three days later, my daughter was auditioned by the manners brigade. Therefore, But then, nothing. Similarly, I was asked to be silent, supposedly not to harm the investigation. Therefore, I informed other children who went to his home but the garage remained open despite everything.”
This Thursday. Consequently, July 31, Our information and witnesses are formal: No other child quoted during the hearing of June 29 was heard by the police before July 28, despite the complaint, the reports, and the potential recurrence. Meanwhile, Grégory Lenoci, a stepfather of a 6-year-old boy, files a complaint in turn on July 22. Two days later, he hits Marc P. and broadcasts video online after warning help. He will go to the authorities himself on July 29. He will pass this Friday before marc p. had been convicted the council chamber which will decide whether or not to extend his preventive detention.
Several families in the neighborhood have since gathered to share their stories. A form of parallel justice, in the absence of official responses. The father of the first known victim, that of the 2020 judgment, is present. The anger he contained for years goes up to the surface. “Me. I have resisted for years (note: between the facts of 2012 and the 2020 judgment) not to put him on the face. Because I believed in justice. And they forgot my son. This man was never condemned finally for what he had done and still today is a trauma for him.”
Lenoci affair | A neighbor of the Namur district testifies: “I had filed a complaint 1 month ago but nothing was moving”
“What is the point of condemning if no one controls?”
Marc p. had been convicted
As for the father having filed the complaint on June 29. 2025, he described a feeling of helplessness anchored in time. “I filed a complaint, it didn’t move. I called, it didn’t move.” And the other marc p. had been convicted father of the boy abused between 2011 and 2012 to add: “Today, I feel accomplice. I regret having done nothing. It is Grégory Lenoci who pays for all the others. For all that a justice has not done.”
For this father, the real problem is the shortcomings in follow -up. “He had to follow a therapy, not to frequent children. He was doing the opposite, without hiding. His garage remained open, the children entered and came out. We talked about it between neighbors. And yet … nothing. What good to have condemned him in 2020 if no one controls?”
Grégory Lenoci’s partner testifies: “He begged the marc p. had been convicted police to act because it was going to go wrong”
New search but still no answer
A new search took place this Thursday at Marc P.’s home in Namur by the federal police, left with several boxes. The seals are still in place. But for families. frustration remains lively and all say that history could have been written otherwise, that the facts potentially committed on their children could have been avoided. “How can a man sentenced to attempted rape on children live by always attending children. smiling at the parents he destroyed?”
On the side of the Namur prosecution, no statement comes to answer these questions. Neither on the management of complaints. nor on the follow -up of the condemned, nor on the slowness in the hearings. At this point, only an official line persists: “In the interest of the investigation, no other comments will marc p. had been convicted be made.”
But in the streets of the neighborhood, we only talk about that. And between words, weariness. A certainty itself, that the judicial system, here, could not protect those who needed it.
Further reading: Panama Papers: almost 40 million euros recovered by Belgium – Big anger at Bertrix City, not qualified in the Belgian Cup – Four years after the serious floods that affected our country, could the situation happen one day? A climatologist advances on the subject – Temu embarks on food in Belgium, competition for supermarkets? “An anecdotal arrival that could become shattering!” – European Shopping Championships – Belgium 3rd after the first test of the team competition in Corugin.
