The duty invites you on the crosspieces of university life. A proposal that is both learned and intimate, to pick all summer like a postcard. Today, we look at the role of Canada in the control of cancer worldwide.
Cancer is one of the largest health challenges in the XXIe century, but international support for the fight against this disease is fragmented. This is the second cause of death in the world, with a disproportionate charge in low -income countries. While cancer care requirements are increasing, the world health landscape is redefined. Significant donors, such as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), withdraw, leaving a vacuum in clinical trials, cancer screening and essential health services.
This disengagement occurs at a time when the world leans towards autocracy and kleptocracy: regimes which tend to relegate health, equity and the rule of law to the second plan. For Canada, it is not only a humanitarian issue: it is also a strategic issue, because health is a trustworthy diplomacy channel.
In this moment of fragility, Canada has an opportunity to seize and responsibility. His historical commitment to public institutions, universal health care and bilingual multilateralism gives him the necessary credibility to exercise leadership by the soft power. Supporting care against global cancer is more than a humanitarian gesture: it is the affirmation of health as a fundamental human right and an act of discreet, but powerful diplomacy.
The global economic burden of cancer is expected to exceed 25,000 billion US dollars between 2020 and 2050, while low -income countries, which concentrate the majority of cancer deaths, assume only half of these costs. This discrepancy between suffering and investment calls leadership based on solidarity. By engaging in global health through partnerships and research and capacity building, Canada can defend human rights, contribute to stability and prove influence by compassion and integrity, rather than force.
In a context where international relations are increasingly defined by strategic competition and transactional diplomacy, global health engagement offers another model, based on long -term values and partnerships. Investing in cancer systems abroad, such as poorly served regions, strengthens alliances, building confidence and projecting democratic ideals without coercion. Improving lives while expanding our influence by credibility rather than by domination is to make soft power A Canadian lever.
Unlike a militarized foreign policy or extractive economic relations, global diplomacy promotes reciprocal collaboration, strengthens international standards and creates scientific and professional cooperation platforms that go beyond political cycles. In a multipolar world, health policy is a foreign policy.
To read also, in the series in summer is made to think
For average power like Canada, it is already a leading diplomatic tool. While President Trump pushes Canada and his allies to increase their military spending, Prime Minister Carney would remember that the soft power Canadian, anchored in health and diplomacy, has always been one of its most credible forces.
The Canadian Federal Government, through World Affairs Canada, has long made women ‘health and gender equality of priorities in its international development strategy. Breast cancer is today the leading cause of cancer mortality in women worldwide, affecting low -income women in low and medium income, where late diagnosis and limited access to treatments are systemic obstacles.
By widening our leadership to female cancers, we can respond to this growing burden while strengthening Canada’s reliability in terms of health equity. Investing in global initiatives on breast cancer would not only save lives, but also to promote the emergence of local female leaderships, whether in clinical, scientific, associative or political circles.
The leadership of Canada in global health is an extension of the values enrolled in our own Canadian health law: universality, accessibility, integrality, transferability and public management. These principles are not only domestic policy ideals: they embody a vision of what of equitable health systems can be worldwide. By aligning our international efforts on the spirit of this national framework, we affirm our identity as a country advocating health as human law and diplomacy focused on dignity and solidarity.
Priorifying oncological care illustrates our values and meets an increasing global need, in an area where Canada can exercise sustainable leadership. This approach would not only comply with Canada’s commitments in global health, but also to strengthen our role as a partner in principle in achieving sustainable development objectives, especially those linked to health, gender equality and inclusive governance.
History recalls that the withdrawal is rarely durable. At the start of the HIV/AIDS crisis, inaction and stigma, especially under Reagan, cost millions of lives. In politics, the pendulum always ends up returning. It took years for the international community to re -engage significantly, and for countries like Canada to take over.
When the current balances will rock, Canada must be ready: not simply to fill the gaps left by others, but to assume leadership based on our convictions. It is a question of engaging with the world, not out of conformism or dependence, but by affirming a Canadian approach to global health based on the lasting effect and the conviction that health is a fundamental right.
