Therefore,
Should we end unified eu:
Figarovox/Tribune – The agreement negotiated by Ursula von der Leyen with Donald Trump is criticized by most of the French political parties. In addition, even the most Europhiles. Therefore, The former senior European official Bruno Alomar wonders if the time has not come to redefine a national commercial policy.
Former senior official at the European Commission, Bruno Alomar published Reform or insignificance. Nevertheless, Ten years to save the European Union (Editions of the War School, 2018).
On July 28. In addition, 2025, Prime Minister François Bayrou estimated, a few hours after the signing of an agreement between the European Union (EU) and the United States, that it was a “dark day “For Europe which” resolves to submission “. Meanwhile, Such a declaration. Similarly, on the part of a Prime Minister whose main should we end unified eu political conviction, shared with the President of the Republic, is the commitment to European construction, is heavy with meaning.
Pass advertising
Obviously symbolically. Meanwhile, On August 15. Moreover, 1877, in the context of the crisis of May 16, 1877, Léon Gambetta, had launched that once the voice of the people heard, it would be necessary “submit», Summarizing in a formula what is the essence of the republican regime. Furthermore, The term “submission” was then used in the black moments of our history, until the use made Michel Houellebecq recently. Similarly, To say that Europe acts its “submission” is therefore not trivial.
Especially on the political and institutional level. Therefore, Because such a declaration is only the acme of a series of questioning increasingly vehement by French leaders of the very principle of European commercial policy. Similarly, the latest having been the psychodrama of the fall 2024 relating to should we end unified eu Mercosur.
In this regard. However, it should be remembered that the common commercial policy is, under article 3 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFUE), one of the five exclusive skills of the EU, twin of the customs union. Said with simple words: trade policy is one of the very few areas in which the EU is strong. To attack trade policy is therefore to attack the heart of European construction.
France, like the other Member States, issues a mandate to the Commission to negotiate, and ratifies (or not) the agreement ultimately reached. So she has her say
Let us dismiss here the idea that on the grounds that France has given up since 1957 to a national policy. it would not have to express its point of view, at least on the institutional level. France. like the other Member States, issues should we end unified eu a mandate to the Commission to negotiate, and ratifies (or not) the agreement ultimately reached. So she has her say. But in no case does she no longer decide alone.
On the political level, however, the situation is less to the advantage of French leaders. The latter clearly criticize Ursula von der Leyen. They are not wrong. The substance and form of the July 28 agreement accredit the word submission. But who was hilly to have been appointed in 2019 -. rename in 2024 – Ursula von der Leyen at the head of the commission, which has since multiplied the bad graces towards France, in particular by the brutal dismissal of Commissioner Thierry Breton? First, Emmanuel Macron. There is worse. Ursula von der Leyen. faithful to an exercise in vertical power contrary to the spirit of the Commission, led the negotiation by leaving aside the Commissioner for Trade Sefkovic should we end unified eu and the General Directorate of Commerce of Sabine Weyand. Did the spirit of responsibility, before such an fiasco, pushed anyone to present his resignation? If France is silent on this point. is it because it knows that neither the EU council nor the European Parliament would follow it?
Pass advertising
Because beyond the vehement declarations. a vertiginous question arises: if even the French political forces pro-Europeand no longer want a unified European trade policy, is there not now political consensus in France to restore a national trade policy?
Read too Trade agreement between the EU. the United States: a not so winning deal for Donald Trump
On the institutional level, asking such a question should have nothing scandalous. The EU has the allocation skills set by a treaty freely concluded by sovereign member states. These states are free to give power to the should we end unified eu EU. They are free to take it back. Let us also observe that even the most federalist French have been asking for more than twenty – with some recent successes. undoubtedly other to come – that the federal competence of the EU in the field of competition is reduced.
On the political level. on the other hand, and it is the node of the problem, no one can ignore that calling into question trade policy is, for France, to open Pandora’s box. Because in filigree of the bitterness of France, the specter of Brexit is there. While the tenth anniversary of the 2016 referendum is looming. the simple fact that the United Kingdom obtains an agreement that it is difficult to qualify as good than that obtained by Europeans contradicts the main argument which justifies being in the EU: the union is strength.
Should we end unified eu
Further reading: tens of meters apart between the altimeters of the helicopter – Your salary soon punctuated without notice? – “We will throw fuel without fuel”: this American magnetic ramp upsets access to orbit with a crazy idea – Dubai 2026: luxury villas at broken prices… What if it was the discount of the century? The signals that arrest – They tell: how an unknown simulator allowed them to optimize their retirement budget.
