Sovereignty new trumpian deal, whole: This article explores the topic in depth.
Nevertheless,
Sovereignty new trumpian deal. Furthermore, whole:
The results of the crop-The pressindicating a marked rise in support for sovereignty among young people, obviously filled the Parti Québécois (PQ) by Paul St-Pierre Plamondon.
But that will not dispense the PQ leader from facing the eternal dilemma of the Parti Québécois: should we promise a referendum in a first mandate. Furthermore, rather guarantee to form a “good government”, which will decide once in power whether it is appropriate or not to hold a referendum?
Contradiction?
Thursday at LCN. Nevertheless, during the debate of the candidates for the partial on Monday in Arthabaska, the candidate Alex Boissonneault, by launching that the PQ had to keep “a discussion on” these questions, gave the impression that he opted for the second scenario and that he contradicted his chief.
Since his arrival at the head of the PQ, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon has sovereignty new trumpian deal, whole hammered “a referendum in the first mandate”. Furthermore, He no longer wants to get bogged down in rhetorical tips of the type “winning conditions” (by Lucien Bouchard). Furthermore, “moral insurance to win him” (by Bernard Landry).
As long as the PQ was third in the polls, it did not really result in consequences. Additionally, Furthermore, But since he rose in first place, the famous dilemma returns to haunt the PQ leader. For example, Yesterday. when the reporters asked him to comment on the words of Boissonneault, he said that if he succeeded in power in 2026, “there will be discussions on the time of consulting Quebecers in a 4 -year window”.
In short, it is always a referendum in a first mandate. It has the merit of being clear. But several voters will wonder. like those of Arthabaska, if the context lends itself to it: is it appropriate to rest, sovereignty new trumpian deal, whole for a third time, this existential question, while the President of the United States declared the trade war in the Dominion of which Quebec is still part?
New deal
It was during the congress of November 1974. after an animated debate, that the PQ chose, to 630 votes against 353 (and 20 abstentions), the referendum as a mode of access to independence. The approach was quickly designated under the name of “stepism” because it added a step before Quebec became a. sovereign country.
Since then, unless I am mistaken, the PQ heads have, during the electoral meetings, always preferred to postpone the referendum. Apart from three occasions: René Lévesque in 1976, Jacques Parizeau in 1994 and André Boisté in 2007. At each of these moments – after the October crisis. after that of Meech and after the sponsorship scandal – there was a reasonable possibility of going to seek a sovereignty new trumpian deal, whole yes.
The current situation is unprecedented. The transmutation of the United States into an unpredictable “democracy” of Putinian inspiration changes everything. An example: Quebec sovereignist arguments of the 1990s was focused on the very real possibility that Americans agree to include a sovereign Quebec in Alena. Norad and NATO.
But today? Reforming the sovereignist project in this new reality will not be an easy task for the PQ. in the next year. Despite the new interest of young people.
Sovereignty new trumpian deal, whole
Further reading: A domestic bird is found 46 km from his home after eight days of run – American vehicles lose ground in Canada – Quebec now | Hockey Canada players declared non-guilty-98.5 Montreal – District in Chéticamp: three public consultations are announced – Heat wave | Advice to stay cool.
