Nevertheless,
Tesla convicted pay astronomical sum:
Tesla was considered partially responsible for an accident in 2019. Furthermore, involving one of its vehicles equipped with Autopilot driving assistance. Meanwhile, The verdict relaunches the question of the security of these systems and the responsibility of the manufacturers.
A Florida Federal Court sentenced Tesla to pay approximately $ 242 million (approximately. For example, 210 million euros) as part of a civil lawsuit tesla convicted pay astronomical sum relating to a fatal accident in Key Largo in April 2019. Consequently, Justice considered that the manufacturer’s autopilot system. Therefore, although having been disabled at the time of the impact, bore a share of responsibility in the collision.
That day. a model was launched at high speed struck a immobilized SUV, in which Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, and his companion Dillon Angulo were. The young woman lost her life, while her boyfriend was seriously injured. According to the complainants, driving assistance should have detected the vehicle stopped and initiate emergency braking, which did not occur.
The jury, made up of eight members, awarded a total of $ 328 million in damage to the victims. A third of this sum is the responsibility of Tesla. the rest to the author of the accident, George McGee, who led the Model S.
Excessive confidence in technology
During his testimony. George McGee recognized Having tesla convicted pay astronomical sum tight your eyes from the road to retrieve your fall phone. It was driving at 100 km/h, in violation of several traffic rules. However. he said he believed that the car would automatically intervene in the event of danger: “I thought the vehicle would brake or held me if it detected something.”
Tesla lawyers hammered that the autopilot was not active at the time of the drama. that the driver had ignored the safety instructions. “The system constantly asks drivers to keep your hands on the steering wheel. eyes on the road”insisted Maître Joel Smith, main defense lawyer.
A controversial verdict
Tesla denounced a decision “regrettable”believing that it slows down technological progress in road safety. “This judgment is likely to dissuade innovations that save lives”Tesla said in a statement. The group has already announced its intention to appeal.
On the side of the complainants. the lawyer Brett Schreiber underlined the tesla convicted pay astronomical sum responsibility of the manufacturer, accused of having poorly presented the capabilities of the autopilot. He denounced an appellation “deception” which would encourage drivers to overestimate the real capabilities of the system. “The word” autopilot “gives the illusion that the car takes it alone, while it is only limited assistance”he said.
Victims’ lawyers also accused Tesla of having hidden crucial elements, such as captured video data shortly before the collision. “This trial revealed what we suspected: the car had a defect that Tesla tried to hide”said the sister of. the deceased.
Globally. The case thus relaunches the debate on the reliability of driving assistance technologies and the communication of manufacturers around their functionalities. For some observers. it could make jurisprudence and influence other decisions to come in an expanding field but also largely supervised by legal gray areas.
Further reading: Alstom: two -digit growth in orders – ADDARD TOWER removes its offer to buy Seven & I – Trump: he threatens Novartis and Roche on the prices of medicines – How Ryanair managed to double his benefit, to the detriment of his passengers – Donald Trump Procute on the possibility of returning the president of the Fed.
