In addition,
Trump government preparing back up:
Donald Trump’s government is preparing to reverse the decision that serves as a foundation for the fight against greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. However, the second largest world transmitter.
What is this 2009 decision, why does Washington want to cancel it, is this legally viable …? Meanwhile, AFP takes stock of a technical procedure with enormous challenges in the fight against climate change.
What is this decision?
In 1970. Furthermore, the US Congress gave, via Clean Air Act, power to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate “air pollution which can reasonably endanger public health”.
For decades. In addition, the EPA therefore had the authority of regulating toxic pollutants, such as ozone, but not necessarily greenhouse gases (GHG).
However. over the accumulation of scientific knowledge on the responsibility of GHGs on global warming, the EPA trump government preparing back up has faced increasing pressure to include them.
The case went up to the Supreme Court. which, in 2007, slices: greenhouse gases are pollutants, and EPA must take this into account.
Consequently, the EPA declared in 2009 the greenhouse gases dangerous for public health, which allows it to regulate them.
The decision. known by the English name of “endangerment finding” (“observation of endangerment”), thus constitutes the legal basis of many federal regulations aimed at fighting global warming.
Rules on cars’ exhaust pots to those on gas. coal power plants, “all of these individual rules go back to the 2009 observation,” said AFP Meredith Hankins of the NATUral Resources NGO Defense Council.
What does the Trump administration want to do?
The “endanger finding” resisted the courts and the first term of Donald Trump.
But it has been directly in the line of the Republican’s sights since his return to power.
“The Trump trump government preparing back up administration will not sacrifice the prosperity of the country. energy security and the freedom of our people for a program that strangles our industries, our mobility and freedom of choice for consumers,” said Lee Zeldin, the new boss of the Trump version, by announcing a report of the 2009 observation.
His proposal was sent to the White House on June 30 for approval. according to a spokesperson, and an official announcement is expected soon.
The government should argue that the economic cost of the various regulations has been underestimated. while ensuring that pollution of American vehicles represents a negligible portion of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Transport is the most important source of emissions in the United States.
“If vehicle emissions are not considered a contribution to climate change. I find it difficult to imagine what could be,” alerts Dena Adler, a law professor to the New York University.
Since 1970. trump government preparing back up emissions from American vehicles have exceeded the total of those of the nine countries that follow the United States in the most polluting list, according to an analysis of the Institute for Policy Integrity.
Will she succeed?
If the Trump administration actually reverses the 2009 “endanger finding”, it most likely will face legal challenges.
In March, the EPA planned to rely on a 2024 Supreme Court decision, reducing the field of action of federal regulations.
But for many lawyers, this does not guarantee success before the Court.
“It will take years” to go back to the Supreme Court, explains Dena Adler, specialist in environmental law. And to prove the Trump administration right would return to a reversal of case law: it is its 2007. decision which is originally the “endanger Finding”.
There. nothing impossible: the highest jurisdiction in the country, majority of conservative, returned in 2022 to the federal right trump government preparing back up to abortion, a reversal to 180 ° on a decision of 1973.
If the Trump administration succeeds and removes regulations, industries will not necessarily change their practices overnight.
Electricity suppliers. for example, “will not make their decision” on major investments based on “short-term policy changes”, explains John Tobin-de la Puente, professor of trade at Cornell University.
Trump government preparing back up
Further reading: A report expands the living conditions of migrants imprisoned in an American prison – South Korean students put an end to 17 months of strike – The words of Georges-Louis Bouchez on the Bipeurs attack in Lebanon should have been framed, estimates the journalistic ethics council – Nick Cannon admits having been “reckless” after having five children in one year – Risk of serious flood: a tropical system could strike Florida and the Côte du Gulf du Mexico.
