Consequently,
Vaping three times more efficient:
An Australian study reveals that electronic cigarettes is three times more effective. In addition, than traditional nicotine substitutes to help socially disadvantaged smokers to quit smoking. Moreover, The clinical trial compared the effectiveness of vaping devices to nicotine pastilles. Nevertheless, gums, showing significantly higher tobacco abandonment in users of electronic cigarettes. Nevertheless, This research is added to a growing corpus of evidence in favor of using the vape as a smoking. Moreover, withdrawal tool. For example,
- In this Australian study. For example, electronic cigarettes allowed three times more precarious smokers to quit smoking than nicotine gums or pastilles.
- The serious side effects were rare and the vape was better tolerated by the participants.
- This work confirms the interest of the vape as a smoking withdrawal tool, especially among disadvantaged audiences.
In precarious vaping three times more efficient smokers, the vape proves (still) its effectiveness
New day, new study on electronic cigarettes. Meanwhile, Yesterday, the results of a clinical trial1 were published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine. In addition, Research. Furthermore, which was conducted by the National Drug and Alcohol Research Center (NDARC), Australian organization in charge of work on the treatment of alcoholism and other drugs, aimed to compare the efficiency of electronic cigarettes to quit smoking, compared to nicotine pastilles and chewing gum. For example, Among people qualified as “Disadvantaged”.
The study took place in Australia. Therefore, The 1. However, 045 participants, daily smokers and receiving government services, were randomly distributed between two groups:
- That of nicotine vaping three times more efficient substitutes was offered an eight -week supply of nicotine gums, or pastilles, with a mint flavor. Therefore, He was free to switch from one to the other product after four weeks. Therefore,
- The group of vapers was provided two devices: an “open” personal vaporizer, that is to say a clearomizer, and one of the type “closed”, in the form of a cartridge pod. In addition, E-liquids were also provided, with tobacco, menthol or fruity flavors. As with the previous group. that of vapers was able to choose the flavor of his choice for the second part of the study.
In parallel with these aids to quit smoking. the participants of the two groups received SMS of encouragement with advice adapted to their treatment.
During the first month, all participants were contacted twice by phone. The researchers asked them if they still smoked. if they used the product vaping three times more efficient attributed to them, and if they felt any side effects. A final call was scheduled seven months later, to find out their smoking status. Those who claimed to no longer smoke spent a breath test in order to detect carbon monoxide. confirm the absence, or not, of smoking. Note. however, that this is one of the limits of this clinical trial: the test in question was only able to detect smoking in the last 24 hours.
Vaping three times more efficient
Without appeal in favor of vaping
Even after having taken into account the individual differences within a socially disadvantaged sample. our analysis revealed that the abandonment rates were higher for the group of vapers compared to nicotine substitutes, regardless of age, sex, nicotine dependence and recent diagnosis or treatment for mental health disorder.Extract from an interview with the main author of this study
The vaping three times more efficient conclusions of this study report better efficiency of the personal vaporizer. whatever the data observed. The main results report that 9.6 % of nicotine gum and lozenging users stopped smoking, compared to 28.4 % in the vapers’ group. The electronic cigarette has therefore been shown Three times more efficient that the substitutes used during this research.
The side effects declared were also less frequent in the group of vapers than in that of nicotine substitutes. With, of course, certain differences. For example. the Vaping group was more likely to declare a cough or headache, while that of substitutes was mainly affected by nausea. The serious side effects were rare and similar in both groups.
Vapoteuses. in addition to freeing nicotine, provide some of the sensory and behavioral aspects that lack people when they stop smoking.Extract from an interview with the main author of this study
vaping three times more efficient
The vape better tolerated
The other notable. difference concerned the premature stop of treatment. 23.2 % of the participants said they had stopped taking their nicotine pastilles. gums before the end of the study, justifying this judgment by not appreciating the taste of the product, or feeling unpleasant side effects. In the vapor group, only 2.2 % stopped vaping earlier than expected. The electronic cigarette therefore seemed to be much better tolerated by these smokers than nicotine substitutes.
Finally, during seven months ‘maintenance, 56.3 % of the vapers’ group continued to use an electronic cigarette, against 30.9 % for the one that received nicotine gums and pastilles.
It is never too late to quit smoking. vaping products are an additional tool in the tooltips for smoking treatment, but there is still work to do to support general practitioners, pharmacists and weaning aid lines when they vaping three times more efficient provide care for patients concerning vapoteuses.Extract from an interview with the main author of this study
This clinical trial. although imperfect since the smoking status has not been controlled beyond 24 hours, remains interesting. He confirms the results of other research having demonstrated that Electronic cigarettes seem more effective in quitting smoking than. nicotine substitutes. At the start of the year. the Cochrane organization, worldwide recognized for the quality of its meta-analyzes, indicated that the personal spray was almost twice as effective to quit smoking as all other nicotine substitutes (patches, etc.). Results that were based on the analysis of 90 studies bringing together nearly 30,000 participants.
“Vapes are not a magic remedy. but they constitute a promising treatment option which leads to higher stop rates than nicotine gum or pastilles for those who are socially disadvantaged. Some smokers have tried all processing options, and additional approaches are vaping three times more efficient needed to increase stop rates. »»said Ryan Courtney, principal researcher and head of the tobacco research group in Ndarc.
In Australia, the sale of vape products is reserved for pharmacies. A situation which led to an explosion of the black market.
Vaping three times more efficient
Sources and references
1 Ryan J. Courtney, Bridget C. Howard, Daniel Barker, et al. Vaporized Nicotine Products for Smoking Cessation Among People Experiencing Social Disadvantage: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. [Epub 15 July 2025]. doi:10.7326/ANNALS-24-03531.
2 Hartmann-Boyce J. McRobbie H, Lindson N, Bullen C, Begh R, Theodoulou A, Notley C, Rigotti NA, Turner T, Butler AR, Hajek P. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD010216. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub4.
The latest scientific research on electronic cigarettes
Further reading: Breakfast cases increase in British Columbia – Even living under the same roof, men and women are not exposed to the same chemicals – Why consume a lot of cheese could promote frequent nightmares? – How parapharmacy care improves the management of certain dermatology patients – Cases of measles in the United States are reaching their highest level since the official eradication of the disease.
