Geneva doctor must return 500,000: This article explores the topic in depth.
Meanwhile,
Geneva doctor must return 500. Meanwhile, 000:
The Federal Court rejects the appeal of a Geneva doctor sentenced to reimburse more than half a million francs to 18 funds. Consequently, The prohibition to practice compulsory care insurance for two years is confirmed.
KEYSTONE
The sixty -something man had already committed in 2005 to reimburse 381. 000 francs to sickness insurers due geneva doctor must return 500,000 to a violation of the principle of treatment of treatment in the 2000s to 2003. In 2018, he was convicted of aggravated and false scam in titles related to his practice in 2005 and 2006.
As early as 2020. around twenty insurers represented by Santésuisse presented several complaints to the insurance tribunal for the canton of Geneva.
By decision of July 7. 2023, this body ordered the doctor to return 569,000 francs to Santésuisse which should then distribute the amounts due to the various funds. She also pronounced a ban on practicing for two years at health insurance costs.
Prescription et transactions – Geneva doctor must return 500,000
In a judgment published on Thursday. the Federal Court did not enter into the amount to be returned, for lack of motivation on this point. He also dismisses the grievances of the appellant against the ban on practicing.
The latter intended to invoke geneva doctor must return 500,000 the prescription of criminal law for the facts that occurred in the early 2000s. In addition. he noted that some of the previous irregularities which were selected against him had been sold through extrajudicial transactions with Santésuisse.
For the 3rd court of public law. the arbitral tribunal could rightly consider the practitioner as a repeat offender with regard to the health insurance law. This text makes it possible to exclude a provider of services “for serious reasons”. This notion does not necessarily imply the existence of a criminal conviction or a judicial transaction, specify the federal judges. (judgment 9C_569/2023 of June 24, 2025)
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’, ‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’); fbq(‘init’, ‘817457858324581’); fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
Further reading: Trump’s bill may increase costs for insurers and reduce Medicaid coverage – Ticino launches two initiatives to reduce medication costs – 900 € arrives on their account this summer – We know how much Meta paid for Apple AI to defection, and it’s really a lot – Société Générale limits telework: a decision that divides.
