| In short |
|
Each year, the energy check represents a breath of fresh air for households with modest income in France. In 2025, some notable changes will modify the way in which this aid is distributed. The postponement of the sending of the check to November, due to a late adoption of the finance law, is one of the main adjustments. During this waiting period, the government urges energy suppliers to be flexible. This measure aims to avoid cuts and favor power reduction. It is therefore essential to understand how to navigate these new rules to continue to benefit from this precious help.
How to get the energy check in 2025?
The energy check, oscillating between 48 and 277 eurosremains reserved for low -income households. To be eligible in 2025, the reference tax income of 2023 must be less than 11,000 euros per unit of consumption (UC). The calculation of consumer units is done by allocating a UC to the first member of the home, 0.5 to the second, and 0.3 to the third. In addition, living in France, whether one is a tenant or owner, is an essential criterion.
It is also crucial to declare your income to the tax administration, even if they are low or non-existent. With the abolition of the housing tax, the government is now based on the delivery point number (PDL) and tax information to allocate the check. The creation of a list of beneficiaries by the DGFIP, the GRD and the energy suppliers should allow a more fluid allocation. However, omissions can occur, especially for new beneficiaries. It is therefore advisable to point out via an online or mail portal so as not to miss this help.
France dropped by Canada: this first futuristic nuclear power plant is based on 70 -year technology to distance G7
The arrival of an energy e-check?
Faced with growing digitalization, the government plans to set up an energy e-check. From the summer, the beneficiaries could see the amount of their check credited to an online personal space. This innovation would make it possible to use the check in several transactions with participating energy suppliers. This new option aims to offer more flexibility of use, a priority for the government.
This dematerialization is part of a desire to adapt public services to new technologies, thus facilitating the lives of citizens. The e-checkery would offer simplified management of aid for beneficiaries, while allowing better traceability of transactions for the authorities.
The largest melting machine in the world succeeds in the unthinkable by generating helium-3 in extreme conditions
The impacts of dematerialization
The introduction of e-checkery could transform the way in which aid is perceived and used in France. The transition to dematerialization could reduce the deadlines for processing and sending, while reducing administrative costs. This would also represent an ecological advantage by limiting the use of paper.
For beneficiaries, the e-checkery would be synonymous with simplicity and speed. By having access to their help directly online, they could manage their consumption more efficiently, while benefiting from increased flexibility for the payment of invoices. However, this transition will require support for less comfortable people with digital tools, in order to guarantee that no one is left out.
Future of the energy check: perspectives and challenges
The modernization of the energy check raises questions about its efficiency and accessibility. Upcoming challenges include the integration of new technologies while maintaining an inclusive approach. The transition to digital could be beneficial, but it is crucial to support this change with measures suitable for vulnerable populations.
The government will also have to assess the economic impact of these new measures on households and energy suppliers. The necessary adjustments must be made to ensure that the energy check continues to fulfill its essential help role. How will these developments influence the daily life of households and the effectiveness of French energy policy?
The author relied on artificial intelligence to enrich this article.
Did you like it? 4.6/5 (29)
