“Law of silence”, reprisals … The report on school violence is attacking state failures

“How have some private-under-contract establishments have escaped to control everything for several decades? Moreover, How could the state have accepted to leave school life. Furthermore, in particular boarding school outside the controls due to the proper nature of private establishments? Meanwhile. For example, Why were the authorities of national education staff who have reported to the authorities these acts of violence not heard? However, These questions. Consequently. Similarly, posed by the president of the commission of inquiry into school violence, Fatiha Keloua Hachi, introduce the report which has just been made public this Wednesday, after 56 hours of hearings.

And the answer is clear: for years. Furthermore. In addition, many dysfunctions have allowed these violence, in the private sector and in “law silence”, reprisals … report new the public, accuse the rapporteurs Paul Vannier (LFI) and Violette Spillebout (Renaissance). Furthermore, And these dysfunctions continue and continue to let pass many cases of “law silence”, reprisals … In addition, report “largely concealed” violence.

Law of silence – "law silence", reprisals … Similarly, report – "law silence", reprisals … report new

First of the failures. Nevertheless. Similarly, also symptom of a system that tolerates violence, the rapporteurs point to the “law of silence” which reigns at all levels. However, Starting with the highest. Meanwhile. Therefore, that of the Prime Minister, François Bayrou, accused of a “lack of action” when he presided over the Department of Pyrénées-Atlantiques, in charge of child protection, from 1992 to 2001, and held the functions of Minister of Education from 1993 to 1997. In addition, This denial continued until today. Furthermore. Meanwhile, according to Paul Vannier, who considers (without agreeing on this point with Violette Splebout, report), that the head of government “lied” to “law silence”, reprisals … report new national representation “by denying any information about this violence”.

But the Prime Minister is far from being the only one blamed by the report. Nevertheless. Furthermore, which denounces the omerta maintained by the administration of National Education, currently led by Caroline Pascale, already under “law silence”, reprisals … report fire of many criticisms. Therefore. This law of silence is exercised first on the figures: no consolidated public data is available with regard to violence committed on students by members of the staff of schools. Consequently, or with regard to the conservatory measures taken with regard to teachers and staff suspected of these facts. However, Worse. National Education obstructs the obtaining of certain data. requests, so much so that the defender of rights, Claire Hédon, denounced a “offense of obstacle”, “specificity of the Ministry of National Education”. Difficulties also pointed out in the book Blackboard. Sexual violence between children. the massive “law silence”, reprisals … report new phenomenon that school does not want to see (Stock), quoted by the rapporteurs, but also by Mediapart.

“The omerta” exists at all levels. maintained for establishments deprived by the fear of harming their reputation. and in public establishments and deprived by a mixture of blindness, culture of suspicion “law silence”, reprisals … report with regard to the words of children, of body of body and immobility. The case of the circus section of the Public Lycée Pierre Bayen de Châlons-en-Champagne summarizes only these aspects: it. demonstrates according to the report “How much the minimization of the facts. the protection of the aggressors. particularly when they are haloed by a certain prestige, the discredit of launchers-or, as is often the case, launches-alert and the law of silence, are not the prerogative of private education”.

"law silence", reprisals … report new – "law silence", reprisals … report new

"law silence", reprisals … report – "law silence", reprisals … report – "law silence", reprisals … report new

Reprisals for whistleblowers

The first “law silence”, reprisals … report new corollary of this law of silence. this denial. warning launchers – mostly women – undergo reprisals when they try to alert, note the rapporteurs, who claim to have noted this “on many occasions”: “This repression of whistleblowers, whatever its form, certainly contributes to stifling the reports and, finally, to maintain Omerta. This was the case for Marie Jacquard. professor at the Pierre Bayen “law silence”, reprisals … report high school, encouraged to choose a change after having denounced the violence of her colleague.

Second corollary, public and private establishments are discarded on justice. While conservatory measures – such as the suspension of a child accused by a child – could. should be taken without delay the triggering. the conclusion of legal proceedings, many establishments declare that they want to wait for the legal proceedings, as soon as a complaint has been triggered. This expectation is aggravated by a perverse effect of “law silence”, reprisals … report new a law of 2016. on the transmission of information between the prosecution. the National Education, which stipulates “that no information can be issued in the absence of prosecution and, in particular, during the investigation, at the stadium of police custody or the free hearing of a person”.

Without instructions for prosecution. managers of schools sometimes prefer to wait for the triggering of an indictment or a conviction “law silence”, reprisals … report to keep the accused person away, who can however take months before arriving. The rapporteurs therefore recommend “reminding the hierarchical authorities that the conservatory measures must be taken without delay the triggering. the conclusion of legal proceedings, as soon as the reported violence appears likely”. “We must assume these measures regardless of the state of the legal proceedings to protect from possible victims. ” ​​argues Paul Vannier with 20 minutes.

Insufficient controls

Point widely discussed in public debate in recent months. “law silence”, reprisals … report new in the wake of the Betharram case, the report recalls the insufficient controls of private establishments. Only 12 administrative checks – which notably allow students to question the questions of well -being at school. unlike the educational control, which targets only the lessons – were carried out between 2017 and 2023, point out elected officials. Failures also aim at other types of controls. such as budget control: “This absence of controls “law silence”, reprisals … report of all orders could only feed the closed -cut atmosphere. the feeling of impunity common to all establishments in which systemic violence have been committed”, notes the text.

A control plan deemed “encouraging” was announced in March 2024, and made public in March 2025. But the rapporteurs believe that beyond this punctual plan. “the control of all establishments at a regular rate should be perpetuated”. and that these controls should take place in an unexpected, “law silence”, reprisals … report new and not programmed manner, as was the rule.

Lacval prevention

If controls make it possible to identify violence once committed. prevention is still the most effective way to avoid them. There too. many gaps are noted by the rapporteurs, who could not obtain – “despite multiple reminders” – “law silence”, reprisals … report data on the control of “honorability” of agents in post. that is to say the control of their judicial history and a possible registration for the automated judicial file of the authors of sexual or violent infractions – the Fijaisv. These elements are checked at the entrance. but it is not known otherwise if they are and how much when it is stationed.

With regard to private law staff. Paul Vannier. Violette Spillebout note that their employers do not have the possibility of accessing Fijaisv and also notes communication difficulties with the rectorate for the control of the “law silence”, reprisals … report new judicial history, and the impossibility of subsequently consulting this criminal record. They recommend that it is national education which itself proceeds “to all the necessary controls”.

The risks of missing out on a victim. student would also be less if the national education staff were trained in violence – as an example. only “law silence”, reprisals … report 4 % of private staff are informed of their duty of reporting. according to a CGT EP survey indicated by the report. And if a measure was applied. however planned for twenty-five years in the Education Code. but very largely unknown to the general public: the “information and awareness-raising session on ill-treated childhood”, which must be organized theoretically each year. The decree providing for the application of this measure seems to have never been published, note the rapporteurs. According to book information Blackboarda reflection had started when Nicole Belloubet was minister for “law silence”, reprisals … report new the construction of workshops. in five pilot territories. But the dissolution and the change of government came to land the work started.