| In short |
|
The recent military operations carried out by the United States in Iran have highlighted the limits of certain weapons, which are however decisive. Among them, the massive GBU-57 bombs Ordnce Penetrator, supposed to destroy underground nuclear infrastructure, have not achieved the expected results. This observation raises questions about the effectiveness of these weapons and on future American army strategies in its fight against underground threats. Faced with this relative failure, the race for military innovation seems more relevant than ever, in particular with the development of new, more efficient weapons.
A nuclear program far from destroying
Despite the hopes placed in the GBU-57, the Iranian nuclear program has been only partially delayed. A report by the American Defense Intelligence Agency, relayed by Reuters, reveals that the strikes only slowed down the program for a few months. This is far from the complete destruction initially claimed. This disappointing result highlights the technical challenges posed by the destruction of deeply buried and protected underground installations.
GBU-57s, theoretically capable of penetrating up to 60 meters underground, failed to meet expectations in this first real use. The American army, aware of these limits, is already considering the development of a new generation of anti-bunker bombs. The Next Generation Penetrator (NGP) has been being designed since the 2010s and could represent the future of underground strikes.
“This American missile reaches Mach 5”: a second Dark Eagle battery deployed by next year
NGP and B-21, a new couple at the heart of the American conventional power?
The Next Generation Penetrator is at the center of current military discussions. A market opinion published in February 2024 reveals that this warhead project should weigh less than 10 tonnes while offering improved breath, fragmentation and penetration. This new bomb could be adapted to the B-21 Raider, the future American stealth bomber.
The B-21 Raider, successor to the famous B-2, should be able to use GBU-57, pending the arrival of the NGP. However, the current GBU-57 stock remains limited. The White House has invested in the production of these bombs to triple their number, but the objective remains to constitute a sufficient stock. These weapons play a crucial role in possible interventions against strategic targets in North Korea, China or Iran.
“She detects your emotions even before you feel them”: AI goes beyond humans in reading feelings
The geopolitical and military issues of the peaceful region
The current situation highlights the strategic importance of the Pacific Region for the United States. The growing tensions with powers like China and North Korea require increased vigilance and reinforced military preparation. The partial failure of GBU-57 in Iran highlights the need for Washington to have effective and sufficient weapons.
Current investments aim to respond to these issues. However, the use of 14 bombs without reaching the desired objective pushes to question the military strategies. The question arises whether the American army will be able to adjust in time for potential conflicts in this region. This strategic reflection is crucial to ensure national security and maintain a dominant position in the face of future challenges.
“10,000 influencers boost their notoriety with this method”: Buy-des-fans.com is essential to explode on social networks
Perspectives and innovations in armaments
Faced with these challenges, innovation in the field of armaments is essential. The United States, with a long tradition of military innovations, turn to advanced technological solutions to strengthen their arsenal. The development of the NGP and the B-21 Raider marks an important step in this approach.
Collaboration between the defense industry and the government is essential to overcome current obstacles. The lessons learned from operations in Iran will serve as a basis for future developments. The question remains open: what will be the next technological advances capable of responding to the strategic challenges of tomorrow ? The answers to these questions will largely determine the ability of the United States to maintain its military supremacy.
The author relied on artificial intelligence to enrich this article.
Did you like it? 4.3/5 (26)
