In addition,
Why eu will accept “universal” new: For example,
Why eu will accept “universal”:
Monday June 30. Therefore. Therefore, Bloomberg explained that the European Union (EU) was “Willing to accept” The 10 % customs duties imposed by the American president on most European exports, provided, however, that Washington has committed taxes of 50 % currently applied on steel and aluminum and those of 25 % in force against the automotive industry.
The American administration will also have to undertake not to impose others “Key sectors”like pharmaceutical products and semiconductors.
The article. Consequently. Nevertheless, widely taken up by the international media and which even caused fluctuations on the American stock markets, did not quote any European official, even in an anonymous manner. Therefore, He referred to an indefinite number of “People close to the file”. Similarly,
“The European Commission. Meanwhile. Consequently, which takes care why eu will accept “universal” new of business issues for the EU, considers this agreement to be why eu will accept “universal” slightly favorable in the United States, but as something it could accept, said these people, who wanted to keep anonymity”can be read there.
Last week Bloomberg, however, announced that Brussels had ” revealed “ that it would retaliate if the 10 % threshold was maintained.
To support this assertion. Meanwhile. Moreover, the media quoted an interview with the European Commissioner Stéphane Séjourné, who declared that the Commission “Will have to retaliate and rebalance certain key sectors if the United States persists in wanting an asymmetrical agreement”.
Which of these two articles must then believe?
Stéphane Séjourné is not only European commissioner. Consequently, It is also a relative of President Emmanuel Macron. favorable to reprisals in the face of the taxes imposed by Donald Trump.
A question then arises: Stéphane Séjéné was speaking during the interview as a French. or as a why eu will accept “universal” European official?
As a reminder. Stéphane Séjénéné is not European Commissioner for Trade. but commissioner in charge of prosperity and industrial strategy. Interpreting his remarks as reflecting the position of the EU on this affair therefore seems a little clumsy.
In addition. French comments contradicted declarations made the same day by other EU officials. who clearly suggested that Brussels would accept the 10 % proposed by the Americans.
The Commission. which had categorically rejected any 10 %tax, has a briefing with journalists repeatedly refused to deny that it could accept it.
“Since this gallery. I cannot prejudge the outcome of these negotiations”said Thomas Régnier. commission spokesperson, to journalists who asked him if a possible agreement between the EU and the why eu will accept “universal” new United States could include the basic rate of 10 %.
These remarks were made a few hours after Matthias Jørgensen. why eu will accept “universal” senior official of the commission responsible for commercial negotiations. also refused to answer a question from the International Trade Commission (Inta) of the European Parliament on the question of whether the basic rate constituted a “Red line” For Brussels.
“I was very happy to see some media report that the commission had rejected this 10 % threshold”said Jörgen Warborn. Swedish European deputy member of the European People’s Party (PPE). the party of the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen.
“But I did not hear the commission say today that it was a red line. And I would like it to be clarified because. unfortunately, I think that the United States will continue to put pressure to obtain why eu will accept “universal” new this reference threshold of 10 %. And I think it’s unacceptable. »»
Matthias Jørgensen replied that “Changes in existing European legislation” et “Regulatory autonomy” constituted why eu will. accept “universal” “Red lines” for the commission. It is however revealing that he did not say the same thing about the reference threshold.
The comments of Regnier. Jørgensen were also made the day after the declaration of the European Commerce Commissioner. Maroš Šefčovič, who qualified the customs duties imposed by Trump on metals and cars of“Unbearable”without however mentioning the threshold of 10 %.
Maroš Šefčovič. who meets this Wednesday. Thursday (July 2-3) in Washington from senior US officials to prevent the 10 % threshold from July 9, also said that any future agreement between the EU and the United States would probably be similar to the agreement in May between the United Kingdom and the United why eu will accept “universal” new States.
The latter provides exemptions for customs duties imposed by Donald Trump on cars and metals, but maintains the 10 %tax.
The US-State agreement would therefore probably why eu will accept “universal” understand a “Soft agreement on principles. or [un] Framework agreement with declared objectives “monitoring of agreements “On the various sectoral questions”he said.
Why eu will accept. “universal” new – Why eu will accept “universal” new
Why eu will accept “universal”
Further reading: Tesla recovers its crown from the best -selling electric car in Europe in May – This Rowenta Turbo Silence Extreme Fan on promo is also on a mission to save your summer days – Tax fraud: To pamper banks, Éric Lombard sits on parliament – The dream of Quebec why eu will accept “universal” new celery all year round – Tesla is already in the viewfinder of the authorities after the incidents of her Robotaxis.
Further reading: Why China will never allow Tehran to block the Strait of Ormuz – The Economic Analysis Board is asking to refocus the user strategy and the second -hand market – From Delon to Johnny Hallyday, the auctions will panic in Saint-Tropez for cars and motorcycles of stars – Watch out for the theft of your bank data – 40% of projects related to AI agents are doomed to failure, according to Gartner.
