When we discover, following an investigation into well-being at work, that moral harassment remains very important in the staff of the Walloon Parliament, we therefore legitimately worried. This important place should testify to great exemplarity.
Consequently, in order to bring back serenity within the registry staff, the parliament office, chaired by former minister Willy Borsus (MR), decided to set up a plan to remedy the various problems that undermine the lives of certain agents.
There is always harassment and attacks within the Walloon Parliament Registry
In this plan, an element arouses some questions. It is a question of putting all the ruling and supervision functions in the registry. This way of making suggests that Mr. Janssens (the famous clerk) was perhaps not the only one to employ management methods qualified as harassment by certain agents who seized the lobby.
At the level of the transplant, it is up to us that certain executives have not experienced this announcement well, although the contours of this overhaul are not known. Each official would however be required to present a project for their cell or service. On this basis, the Parliament would decide to maintain, or not in its post, this manager. The president of the Walloon Parliament, Willy Borsus, believes that this way of proceeding “is provided by the statutes. It has not been used in the past, but it seems logical to do so with evaluations based on objectives “. More specifically, he explains that this process will cause “Postal renewal, choices, especially if there is a competition between two people for a position. But it should also be noted that some may not be candidates for a renewal … “
Walloons do not all have access to fundamental rights in the same way
A possible retirement before time
In addition, certain advantages which concern only the agents of the registry and which had been highlighted at the time of the clerk affair are still applying. Among these advantages, the voluntary provision which allows an agent of the registry to retire in early manner. To obtain this advantage, an agent must be between 59 and 64 years old and have made a minimum career of 25 years within the registry. In addition, the remuneration of these agents is almost maintained as it is and they still benefit from the various benefits granted to the staff (in terms of insurance). This situation inevitably raises questions. Why do they benefit from a treatment different from the rest of the population? An argument put forward at the time lived in the fact that they could not be unionized. Good news, however: the situation should evolve. The modification of the status is being analyzed, we are assumed on the side of the acting clerk.
The heart of Walloon democracy must be exemplary, it was written above. It must also not be a place where rights are different, whether they are to the advantage of agents or their disadvantages. Things are moving forward, certainly not all at the same rate, but they still seem to move forward.
