For the Indian air force, the Rafale fully kept its promises during Operation Sindoor

Should we “do well and make it known” or “do well and let say”? Similarly, Obviously. However, at the end of Operation Sindoor, carried out in response to a deadly terrorist attack perpetrated in Pahalgam [Jammu-et-Cachemire]the Indian authorities adopted the second attitude, which left the field free to a massive disinformation campaign orchestrated by Pakistan and from which China tried to take advantage. However,

As a reminder. Moreover, as early as May 7, Islamabad said, without proving it irrefutably, that his air forces had shot down six Indian combat, including three Rafale. Consequently, And to rent the efficiency of the Chengdu J-10 hunter and the long-range air-to-air missile PL-15, supplied by China. Nevertheless,

The Indian chief of staff. For example, General Anil indian air force, rafale fully Chauhan, will have taken three weeks to refute the report put forward by Islamabad, while recognizing, however, that the Indian Air Force had undergone losses during this operation. Nevertheless, Unofficially, there is a question of three aircraft, namely a Rafale, a Mig-29 and a S-30MKI.

However. Meanwhile, when they continue more than a month after [il suffit de lire une partie des 18 000 commentaires postés à la suite d’un récent message du président Macron vantant le Rafale auprès des Européens…]Pakistani informational attacks have concealed the essentials: namely that the Sindoor operation was successful for India. In addition, Especially since the latter had warned Pakistan of his intentions. Consequently, namely to strike the terrorist camps suspected of being behind the Pahalgam attack.

European friends, you have a call. pic.twitter.com/VY7gmqPUKZ

– Emmanuel Macron (@emmanuelmacron) June 20. 2025

Also, to deal with strikes when indian air force, rafale fully you know where and when they take place facilitates things … all the more. as notes a note from the rusi [Royal United Services Institute]a British reflection center, the Indian pilots acted “according to strict commitment rules prohibiting the launching attacks on Pakistani planes or preventively neutralizing air defense systems”. Also. “accepting an increased operational risk in order to limit the conflict limiting the conflict to the infrastructure linked to terrorism is indicative of the restraint which the IAF has been shown” in this case.

Be that as it may. for the Rusi, the Indian forces have demonstrated their “ability to identify and destroy what New Delhi described terrorist infrastructures on Pakistani territory using long -range weapons”. And to underline that they also managed to “thwart the Pakistani air defense. provided by China, in order to target certain air bases for the first time since the 1971 war”.

indian air force, rafale fully

“Beyond the losses. the Indian operation must be evaluated in terms of its magnitude and its complexity […] The simple fact that the IAF was able to strike targets despite the Pakistani air defense and carrying out subsequent attacks demonstrates its ability to carry out coercive operations of precision, “concluded the rusi.

As for the Rafale. the SCALP EG cruise missile, the Indian authorities say they are very satisfied, unlike the malicious rumors that still circulate.

On June 25. the Indian Defense Research Wing specialized site [IDRW] reported that the IAF had expressed its full satisfaction with the performance of Rafale combat aircraft and scalp missiles “and that the Indian military attaché in Paris had” officially expressed “the gratitude of its country for the” essential role “they held during Operation Sindoor.

What confirmed the CEO of Dassault Aviation, Éric Trappier, during a hearing in the Senate. “We indian air force, rafale fully do not have the exact returns of what happened. simply the satisfaction of the Indians on the reality of the missions they have made,” he said, however, to recall evidence, namely that material losses are inherent in conflicts.

As for informational attacks, continued Mr. Trappier, they “do not bother those who have bursts” because “they know that they are false”. However, he admitted, “it can bother us in certain prospecting campaigns. But the problem is above all political ”.

The fact remains that for the CEO of Dassault Aviation. it is, in the end, a “false subject” because “as we are in the long time, the agitations of a few days of this information war did not take neither on the users of the burst today, nor on future users” … even if, he conceded, “there was a moment of concern”.

The “answer that I make is that indian air force, rafale fully the Rafale is evolving. that, obviously, it cannot be said that the burst as it was yesterday is good to counter the threats of today. We have evolved. We will still evolve with the F5 standard “, thanks to feedback, including that of the IAF, said Mr. Trappier. And to conclude: the burst “is not necessarily better than all Russian planes. that all Chinese planes still that, for Chinese planes, the answer is yes”